ArticleEuropean radiology2020
Benefits of
Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of cross-sectional and endoscopic imaging in ampullary tumours: systematic review.The British journal of surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Prognostic significance of baselineBMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Application of imaging technology for the diagnosis of malignancy in the pancreaticobiliary duodenal junction (Review).Oncology letters · 2024Review
- Evaluation of Malignancy Risk of Ampullary Tumors Detected by Endoscopy Using 2-[Korean journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Prediction of tumor recurrence and poor survival of ampullary adenocarcinoma using preoperative clinical and CT findings.European radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDiagnosing ampullary and duodenal papillary carcinomas (ADPCs) is challenging. In the present study, we investigated the application value of
methods
results
conclusionsThe present study demonstrated that KEY POINTS: • It is a challenge for CT and MRI to diagnose ampullary carcinoma, especially at their early stage. • Our study demonstrated that the benefit of PET/CT was improving the diagnostic confidence for ampullary and duodenal papillary carcinomas. •
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.