Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32346786›Full record

Observational studyGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2020

Feelings, preoperative anxiety, and need for information in patients undergoing intravitreal injections.

A Martel, S Nahon-Esteve, K Martini, F Almairac, S Baillif

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Intravitreal air bubbles following intravitreal injections: a comprehensive analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A MartelOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France. martel.a@chu-nice.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3836-7126
S Nahon-EsteveOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France.
K MartiniOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France.
F AlmairacNeurosurgery Department, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France.
S BaillifOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess feelings, preoperative anxiety, and need for information in patients undergoing intravitreal injections (IVI).

methodsAn observational cross-sectional study was conducted in our tertiary university care center between December 2017 and December 2018. Consecutive patients undergoing IVI were included. A paper survey was completed before and after IVI to assess patient experience. Preoperative anxiety and need for information were assessed using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety Information Scale (APAIS) score.

resultsHundred patients with a median age of 76.5 years (42-95, SD = 10.1) were included. Median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in both eyes was 0.4 logMAR. Main IVI indications were wet age-related macular degeneration (n = 58), diabetic macular edema (n = 19), and venous occlusion (n = 16). The IVI most unpleasant steps were as follows: using an eyelid retractor, needle entry, changing of physician from one IVI to another, the pre-IVI waiting time, and the high number of IVI required for disease control. Preoperative anxiety (APAIS score ≥ 11) was correlated in the multivariate analysis with the need for information (p = 0.004), changing of ophthalmologist between different IVI sessions (p = 0.006), and pain expected before the IVI (p = 0.010). The need for information (APAIS score ≥ 5) was only associated with the preoperative anxiety in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.001).

conclusionPreoperative anxiety and need for information are common in patients undergoing IVI even after many IVI. Being injected by different practitioners was strongly correlated with preoperative anxiety and should be avoided as much as possible. Better educational and information programs are needed.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMacula LuteaMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresPreoperative PeriodAngiogenesis InhibitorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAge-related macular degenerationAnxietyAPAIS scoreIntravitreal injection

Identifiers

PMID32346786
OpenAlexW3017696172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.