Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32346747›Full record

ReviewActa dermato-venereologica2020

Melanoma Risk and Melanocyte Biology.

Julie U Bertrand, Eirikur Steingrimsson, Fanélie Jouenne, Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets, Lionel Larue

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Autocrine CysLTOncogene · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Crosstalk in Skin: Loss of Desmoglein 1 in Keratinocytes Inhibits BRAFThe Journal of investigative dermatology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Functional Role of Protein Phosphatase-6 (Current medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julie U BertrandCurie Institute, PSL Research University, INSERM U1021, Normal and Pathological Development of Melanocytes, Orsay, France.
Eirikur Steingrimsson
Fanélie Jouenne
Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets
Lionel Larue

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous melanoma arises from melanocytes following genetic, epigenetic and allogenetic (i.e. other than epi/genetic) modifications. An estimated 10% of cutaneous melanoma cases are due to inherited variants or de novo mutations in approximately 20 genes, found using linkage, next-generation sequencing and association studies. Based on these studies, 3 classes of predisposing melanoma genes have been defined based on the frequency of the variants in the general population and lifetime risk of developing a melanoma: (i) ultra-rare variants with a high risk, (ii) rare with a moderate risk, and (iii) frequent variants with a low risk. Most of the proteins encoded by these genes have been shown to be involved in melanoma initiation, including proliferation and senescence bypass. This paper reviews the role(s) of these genes in the transformation of melanocytes into melanoma. It also describes their function in the establishment and renewal of melanocytes and the biology of pigment cells, if known.

Indexed as

MutationAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCell LineageGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMelaninsMelanocytesMelanomaMelanosomesMutation RatePhenotypeRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSkin NeoplasmsWhite PeopleBiomarkers, TumorMelaninsembryonic developmentgermline mutationinherited melanomamelanocyte stem cells

Identifiers

PMID32346747
PMCPMC9189750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.