Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32346657›Full record

ArticleBioactive materials2020

Near-infrared responsive 5-fluorouracil and indocyanine green loaded MPEG-PCL nanoparticle integrated with dissolvable microneedle for skin cancer therapy.

Ying Hao, YuWen Chen, XinLong He, Fan Yang, RuXia Han, ChengLi Yang, Wei Li, ZhiYong Qian

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioactive materials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
19.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ying HaoState Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, 610041, PR China.
YuWen ChenState Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, 610041, PR China.
XinLong HeState Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, 610041, PR China.
Fan YangState Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, 610041, PR China.
RuXia HanState Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, 610041, PR China.
ChengLi YangState Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, 610041, PR China.
Wei LiDepartment of Dermatovenereology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, PR China.
ZhiYong QianState Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, 610041, PR China.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of skin cancer is rising along with the rapid population aging in recent years. Traditional therapies, such as surgical treatment, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, photodynamic therapy, and immunotherapy, may accompany serious side effects, limiting their clinical benefits. According to the biological characteristics of skin cancer, we have already established two kinds of synergetic systems of photothermal therapy (microneedle) and chemotherapy, containing gold nanorods (GNR). Although the microneedle system exhibited great potential for skin cancer treatment, the system could be still improved further. So, we designed a near-infrared light-responsive 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) and indocyanine green (ICG) loaded monomethoxy-poly (ethylene glycol)-polycaprolactone (MPEG-PCL) nanoparticle (5-Fu-ICG-MPEG-PCL), and then 5-Fu-ICG-MPEG-PCL was integrated with a hyaluronic acid dissolvable microneedle system (HA MN) to get 5-Fu-ICG-MPEG-PCL loaded HA MN for treating skin cancers, including human epidermoid cancer and melanoma. In this system, hyaluronic acid, the microneedle carrier, possesses good skin penetration ability and is approved by FDA as a pharmaceutical adjuvant; 5-Fu is recommended by FDA for skin cancer treatment; ICG, a photothermal agent, possesses a strong photothermal ability and is approved by FDA for its use in the human body. We hypothesized that 5-Fu-ICG-MPEG-PCL could be delivered by the dissolvable microneedle through the skin, and the release behavior of the drug in the nanoparticle could be controlled by near-infrared light for achieving a single-dose cure of skin cancer, improving the cure rate of skin cancer and providing a new idea and possibility for the clinical treatment of skin cancer.

Indexed as

5-Fluorouracil (5-Fu)Hyaluronic acid dissolvable microneedle (HA MN)Indocyanine green (ICG)Monomethoxy-poly (ethylene glycol)-polycaprolactone (MPEG-PCL)Skin cancer

Identifiers

PMID32346657
PMCPMC7176747
OpenAlexW3018583917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.