Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32346606›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy oncolytics2020

Qiang Liu, Jie Zhai, Xiangyi Kong, Xiangyu Wang, Zhongzhao Wang, Yi Fang, Jing Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy oncolytics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Qiang LiuDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China.
Jie ZhaiDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China.
Xiangyi KongDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China.
Xiangyu WangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China.
Zhongzhao WangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China.
Yi FangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China.
Jing WangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A plethora of previous studies have been focused on the role of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) in cancer immunity; however, the alternative way of targeting tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO2) in cancer immunotherapy has been largely ignored. In particular, the specific role of TDO2 in breast cancer remains unclear. In the present study, we systematically explored and validated the expression and prognostic value of TDO2 in breast cancer using large-scale transcriptome data. We observed overexpression of TDO2 in many types of cancer tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues. TDO2 overexpression was revealed to be positively correlated with malignancy and tumor grade in breast cancer. TDO2 expression was higher in estrogen-negative breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer, and it was correlated with worse outcome in breast cancer patients. TDO2 expression was correlated with immune infiltrates and tryptophan metabolism-related genes (IDO1 and kynureninase [KYNU]). Therefore, our results indicated that TDO2 plays a pivotal role in regulating the immune microenvironment and tryptophan metabolism in breast cancer, and it predicts poor prognosis in breast cancer, which suggests that TDO2 might be a promising novel immunotherapy target for breast cancer. Additionally, we established the concept that tryptophan-catabolizing enzymes (IDO1, IDO2, TDO2, and KYNU) may function through co-regulating the immunological microenvironment, and thus immunotherapy targeting IDO1 alone might be insufficient.

Indexed as

breast cancercancer immunotherapyIDO1IDO2immune infiltratesKYNUTDO2

Identifiers

PMID32346606
PMCPMC7178007
OpenAlexW3014990254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.