Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32346553›Full record

ReviewBioelectronic medicine2020

A review of the bioelectronic implications of stimulation of the peripheral nervous system for chronic pain conditions.

Timothy R Deer, Ramana Naidu, Natalie Strand, Dawn Sparks, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Hemant Kalia, Jennifer M Hah, Pankaj Mehta, Dawood Sayed, Amitabh Gulati

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioelectronic medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03484429 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Postoperative Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on Acute and Chronic Amputation Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorHunter Holmes Mcguire Veteran Affairs Medical CenterRan2017 to 2021Enrolled16ConditionsPhantom Limb Pain, Postoperative Pain, Neuroma, Acute PainArmsPeripheral nerve stimulation, Standard Medical Therapy
NCT06868342 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Determination of Feasibility of Reversible Conduction Block Generated Using Peripheral Nerve Stimulator in Treatment of Focal Spasticity and the Stimulation Parameters for the Same.

TypeinterventionalSponsorWalton Centre NHS Foundation TrustRan2024 to 2024Enrolled4ConditionsSpasticity, Spasticity in Participants With Multiple Sclerosis, Spasticity Post Stroke, Spasticity Related to Any Cause Except Cerebral PalsyArmsHigh-frequency nerve conduction block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Latest Advances in Regional Anaesthesia.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Advances in Pain Medicine: a Review of New Technologies.Current pain and headache reports · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mechanism of Action of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.Current pain and headache reports · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Timothy R DeerSpine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA.
Ramana NaiduSpine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA.
Natalie StrandSpine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA.
Dawn SparksSpine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA.
Alaa Abd-ElsayedSpine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA.
Hemant KaliaSpine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA.
Jennifer M HahSpine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA.
Pankaj MehtaSpine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA.
Dawood SayedSpine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA.
Amitabh GulatiSpine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA.
The Spine & Nerve Centers of the Virginias · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeripheral Nerve Stimulation has been used to treat human disease including pain for several decades. Innovation has made it a more viable option for treatment of common chronic pain processes, and interest in the therapy is increasing. MAIN BODY: While clinical data is forthcoming, understanding factors that influence successful outcomes in the use of PNS still needs to be delineated. This article reviews the evolution and bioelectronic principles of peripheral nerve stimulation including patient selection, nerve targets, techniques and guidance of target delivery. We collate the current evidence for outcomes and provide recommendations for salient topics in PNS.

conclusionPeripheral nerve stimulation has evolved from a surgically invasive procedure to a minimally invasive technique that can be used early in the treatment of peripheral nerve pain. This review identifies and addresses many of the variables which influence the success of PNS in the clinical setting.

Indexed as

Chronic painNeurostimulationPeripheral nerveReviewUltrasound guidance

Identifiers

PMID32346553
PMCPMC7181529
OpenAlexW3019821775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.