Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32346521›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of global health2020

Global Prevalence and Device Related Causes of Needle Stick Injuries among Health Care Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Salehoddin Bouya, Abbas Balouchi, Hosien Rafiemanesh, Mehrbanoo Amirshahi, Majid Dastres, Mahdieh Poodineh Moghadam, Niaz Behnamfar, Mahmood Shyeback, Mahin Badakhsh, Jasem Allahyari and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 187 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Salehoddin BouyaInternal Medicine and Nephrology, Clinical Immunology Research Center, Ali-Ebne Abitaleb Hospital, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, IR.
Abbas BalouchiStudent Research Committee, Nursing and Midwifery School, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR.
Hosien RafiemaneshStudent Research Committee, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR.
Mehrbanoo AmirshahiDepartment of Midwifery, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, IR.
Majid DastresNursing and Midwifery school, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, IR.
Mahdieh Poodineh MoghadamDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, IR.
Niaz BehnamfarDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of nursing and midwifery, Tehran medical sciences, Islamic Azad university, Tehran, IR.
Mahmood ShyebackBushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, IR.
Mahin BadakhshDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, IR.
Jasem AllahyariZahedan University of medical sciences, Zahedan, IR.
Adhra Al MawaliCentre of Studies and Research, Oman Ministry of Health, Muscat, OM.
Abbas EbadiBehavioral Sciences Research Center, Life style institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR.
Asiyeh DezhkamDepartment of Pediaterics, Iranshahr University of Medical Sciences, Iranshahr, IR.
Karen A DaleyAmerican Nurses Association, Massachusetts, US.
Zabol University of Medical Sciences · IRZahedan University of Medical Sciences · IRAmerican Nurses Association · USBaqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences · IRBushehr University of Medical Sciences · IRIranshahr University · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran · IRMinistry of Health · UAShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) suffer more than 2 million occupational needle-stick injuries (NSIs) annually. Goal: To determine the global prevalence and causes of NSIs among HCWs. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, three databases (PubMed, Web of science, and Scopus) were searched for reports from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2018. The random effects model was used to determine the prevalence of NSIs among HCWs. Hoy et al.'s instrument was employed to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Findings: A total of 87 studies performed on 50,916 HCWs in 31 countries worldwide were included in the study. The one-year global pooled prevalence of NSIs among HCWs was 44.5% (95% CI: 35.7, 53.2). Highest prevalence of NSIs occurred in the South East Asia region at 58.2% (95%, CI: 36.7, 79.8). By job category, prevalence of NSIs was highest among dentists at 59.1% (95% CI: 38.8, 79.4), Hypodermic needles were the most common cause of NSIs at 55.1% (95% CI: 41.4, 68.9). Conclusion: The current high prevalence of NSIs among HCWs suggests need to improve occupational health services and needle-stick education programs globally.

Indexed as

CannulaDentistsHealth PersonnelHumansNeedlesNeedlestick InjuriesNursesOccupational InjuriesPhysiciansPrevalenceStudents, Nursing

Identifiers

PMID32346521
PMCPMC7181946
OpenAlexW3015033438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.