Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32346520›Full record

ArticleCase reports in women's health2020

Postnatal diagnosis of an occult uterine scar dehiscence after three uncomplicated vaginal births after Caesarean section: A case report.

Fong Lien Kwong, Ibraheem Hamoodi

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in women's health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Secondary postpartum hemorrhage due to uterine scar dehiscence, a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fong Lien KwongNorthumbria Specialist Emergency Care Hospital, Northumbria Way, Cramlington, Newcastle NE23 6NZ, United Kingdom.
Ibraheem HamoodiNorthumbria Specialist Emergency Care Hospital, Northumbria Way, Cramlington, Newcastle NE23 6NZ, United Kingdom.
Northumbria Specialist Emergency Care Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe incidence of Caesarean sections has been increasing in the United Kingdom. Obstetricians have become more inclined to offer a trial of a vaginal birth to women following a single uncomplicated Caesarean section due to growing recognition of the high morbidity associated with repeat abdominal surgeries, and the relative rarity of a Caesarean scar defect causing complications at subsequent vaginal deliveries. The diagnosis of a Caesarean scar defect such as a uterine scar dehiscence in the postnatal period still remains elusive due to its vague presentation. An incorrect diagnosis or a delay in diagnosis can lead to unnecessary interventions or delay the management of patient symptoms. CASE PRESENTATION: A 35-year-old woman with a single Caesarean section and three subsequent uncomplicated vaginal deliveries was diagnosed with an occult scar dehiscence two weeks postnatally. She initially complained of persistent vaginal bleeding and underwent a suction evacuation for suspected retained placental tissue. Her symptoms did not improve, and a CT scan was requested to rule out a uterine perforation following the surgical procedure. The CT scan suggested a uterine dehiscence at the level of the previous scar. As the patient remained clinically well, her symptoms were managed conservatively. She underwent a laparoscopic sterilisation six months later and was discharged as the scar defect had fully resolved.

conclusionClinicians should remain vigilant about the possibility of an occult scar defect in women with a previous Caesarean section who present with persistent vaginal bleeding and pain in the postnatal period.

Indexed as

Bladder flap haematomaCaesarean scar defectCS, Caesarean SectionCSD, Caesarean Scar DefectCT, Computed TomographyMRI, Magnetic Resonance ImagingNiche formationTAS, Transabdominal scanTVS, Transvaginal scanVBACVBAC, Vaginal Birth After Caesarean section

Identifiers

PMID32346520
PMCPMC7178318
OpenAlexW3016419511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.