ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2020
Intravitreal injection of conbercept combined with retinal photocoagulation on macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conbercept combined with laser photocoagulation in the treatment of diabetic macular edema and its influence on intraocular cytokines.World journal of diabetes · 2023Article
- Short-term effects of intravitreal Conbercept injection combined with laser photocoagulation on macular edema secondary to ischemic retinal vein occlusion.International journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Proteomic Study of Aqueous Humor and Its Application in the Treatment of Neovascular Glaucoma.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effects of Conbercept combined with retinal photocoagulation on macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) were investigated. A total of 98 patients (98 eyes) with macular edema secondary to BRVO were collected. The central macular thickness (CMT), incidence rate of complications after treatment and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were recorded. Also the factors affecting visual recovery of patients were analyzed. At 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after treatment, the BCVA in both groups was significantly superior to that before treatment (P<0.05). In the combination group and laser group, the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) of BCVA increased from 0.84±0.47 to 0.34±0.10 and from 0.89±0.49 to 0.45±0.14, and CMT declined from 559.5±152.7 to 267.8±19.8 µm and from 570.3±172.6 to 314.7±18.4 µm. It was observed that at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after treatment, the BCVA in combination group was obviously better than that in laser group (P=0.008, P<0.001, P=0.004, P<0.001, respectively), while CMT in combination group was obviously smaller than that in laser group (P=0.009, P=0.002, P<0.001, P<0.001). Conbercept with retinal photocoagulation can effectively improve the visual acuity and reduce the CMT. The visual recovery of patients after treatment is related to the BCVA before treatment, decreased value of CMT at 1 month after treatment and integrity of external limiting membrane (ELM).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.