Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32346362›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care2020

Evaluation of an Assertive Management and Integrated Care Service for Frequent Emergency Department Attenders with Substance Use Disorders: The Impact Project: Evaluating an assertive management service for frequent ED attenders with substance use disorders.

Nicholas Lintzeris, Rachel M Deacon, Marian Shanahan, James Clarke, Stephanie MacFarlane, Stefanie Leung, Michelle Schulz, Anthony Jackson, Daniel Khamoudes, David E A Gordon and 1 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicholas LintzerisThe Langton Centre, Drug and Alcohol Services, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Surry Hills NSW, AU.
Rachel M DeaconThe Langton Centre, Drug and Alcohol Services, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Surry Hills NSW, AU.
Marian ShanahanDrug Policy Modelling Program, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW, AU.
James ClarkeThe Langton Centre, Drug and Alcohol Services, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Surry Hills NSW, AU.
Stephanie MacFarlaneThe Langton Centre, Drug and Alcohol Services, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Surry Hills NSW, AU.
Stefanie LeungThe Langton Centre, Drug and Alcohol Services, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Surry Hills NSW, AU.
Michelle SchulzThe Langton Centre, Drug and Alcohol Services, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Surry Hills NSW, AU.
Anthony JacksonThe Langton Centre, Drug and Alcohol Services, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Surry Hills NSW, AU.
Daniel KhamoudesPrince of Wales Hospital Emergency Department, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Barker Street, Randwick, NSW, AU.
David E A GordonThe Langton Centre, Drug and Alcohol Services, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Surry Hills NSW, AU.
Apo DemirkolThe Langton Centre, Drug and Alcohol Services, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Surry Hills NSW, AU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFrequent attenders to Emergency Departments (ED) often have contributing substance use disorders (SUD), but there are few evaluations of relevant interventions. We examine one such pilot assertive management service set in Sydney, Australia (IMPACT), aimed at reducing hospital presentations and costs, and improving client outcomes.

methodsIMPACT eligibility criteria included moderate-to-severe SUD and ED attendance on ≥5 occasions in the previous year. A pre-post intervention design examined clients' presentations and outcomes 6 months before and after participation to a comparison group of eligible clients who did not engage.

resultsBetween 2014 and 2015, 34 clients engaged in IMPACT, with 12 in the comparison group. Clients demonstrated significant reductions in preventable (p < 0.05) and non-preventable (p < 0.01) ED presentations and costs, and in hospital admissions and costs (p < 0.01). IMPACT clients also reported a significant reduction in use days for primary substance (p < 0.01). The comparison group had a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in non-preventable visits only.

conclusionsAssertive management services can be effective in preventing hospital presentations and costs for frequent ED attenders with SUDs and improving client outcomes, representing an effective integrated health approach. The IMPACT service has since been refined and integrated into routine care across a number of hospitals in Sydney, Australia.

Indexed as

assertive carefrequent ED attendersintegrated caresubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID32346362
PMCPMC7181945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.