Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32346011›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

In vivo large-scale analysis of Drosophila neuronal calcium traces by automated tracking of single somata.

Felipe Delestro, Lisa Scheunemann, Mélanie Pedrazzani, Paul Tchenio, Thomas Preat, Auguste Genovesio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Enhanced neuroimaging with a calcium sensor inJournal of biomedical optics · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. TACI: An ImageJ Plugin for 3D Calcium Imaging Analysis.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felipe Delestro *Computational Bioimaging and Bioinformatics, IBENS, ENS, INSERM, CNRS, PSL, 46 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
Lisa Scheunemann *Genes and Dynamics of Memory Systems, Brain Plasticity Unit, CNRS, ESPCI Paris, PSL, 10 Rue Vauquelin, 75005, Paris, France.
Mélanie PedrazzaniGenes and Dynamics of Memory Systems, Brain Plasticity Unit, CNRS, ESPCI Paris, PSL, 10 Rue Vauquelin, 75005, Paris, France.
Paul TchenioGenes and Dynamics of Memory Systems, Brain Plasticity Unit, CNRS, ESPCI Paris, PSL, 10 Rue Vauquelin, 75005, Paris, France.
Thomas PreatGenes and Dynamics of Memory Systems, Brain Plasticity Unit, CNRS, ESPCI Paris, PSL, 10 Rue Vauquelin, 75005, Paris, France. thomas.preat@espci.fr.
Auguste GenovesioComputational Bioimaging and Bioinformatics, IBENS, ENS, INSERM, CNRS, PSL, 46 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France. auguste.genovesio@ens.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1877-5595
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How does the concerted activity of neuronal populations shape behavior? Impediments to address this question are primarily due to critical experimental barriers. An integrated perspective on large scale neural information processing requires an in vivo approach that can combine the advantages of exhaustively observing all neurons dedicated to a given type of stimulus, and simultaneously achieve a resolution that is precise enough to capture individual neuron activity. Current experimental data from in vivo observations are either restricted to a small fraction of the total number of neurons, or are based on larger brain volumes but at a low spatial and temporal resolution. Consequently, fundamental questions as to how sensory information is represented on a population scale remain unanswered. In Drosophila melanogaster, the mushroom body (MB) represents an excellent model to analyze sensory coding and memory plasticity. In this work, we present an experimental setup coupled with a dedicated computational method that provides in vivo measurements of the activity of hundreds of densely packed somata uniformly spread in the MB. We exploit spinning-disk confocal 3D imaging over time of the whole MB cell body layer in vivo while it is exposed to olfactory stimulation. Importantly, to derive individual signal from densely packed somata, we have developed a fully automated image analysis procedure that takes advantage of the specificities of our data. After anisotropy correction, our approach operates a dedicated spot detection and registration over the entire time sequence to transform trajectories to identifiable clusters. This enabled us to discard spurious detections and reconstruct missing ones in a robust way. We demonstrate that this approach outperformed existing methods in this specific context and made possible high-throughput analysis of approximately 500 single somata uniformly spread over the MB in various conditions. Applying this approach, we find that learned experiences change the population code of odor representations in the MB. After long-term memory (LTM) formation, we quantified an increase in responsive somata count and a stable single neuron signal. We predict that this method, which should further enable studying the population pattern of neuronal activity, has the potential to uncover fine details of sensory processing and memory plasticity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutomationCalciumDrosophila melanogasterMemory, Long-TermNeuronsCalcium

Identifiers

PMID32346011
PMCPMC7188892
OpenAlexW3020171483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.