ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2020
Feasibility of blood testing combined with PET-CT to screen for cancer and guide intervention.
Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 360 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
360 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 644 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-cancer early detection tests for general population screening: a systematic literature review.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Real-time evaluation and adaptation to facilitate rapid recruitment in a large, prospective cohort study.BMC health services research · 2024Trial
- Pulmonary nodules: classification, biomarkers, signaling pathways, diseases, early diagnosis and management.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- The Vanguard Study: Assessing feasibility of conducting randomized trials of novel multi-cancer detection tests.Contemporary clinical trials · 2026Article
- Liquid biopsy for early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Design, Construction, and Application of Implantable Fiber Biosensors.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Beyond Detection Limits: Integrated Biosensors for Molecular Diagnostics, Longitudinal Monitoring, and Clinical Translation.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Progress, challenges, and future directions of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk populations.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Multifeature sequencing-based liquid biopsy for cancer diagnosis and monitoring.Genome medicine · 2026Review
- Paired Capillary and Venous Serum Specimen Agreement for Protein Biomarker Measurements and Risk Category Outputs in a Multi-Cancer Early Detection Tool.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Liquid biopsy-based multi-omics approach for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (ASCEND-Hep): a multiphase prospective development and validation study.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Implications of Multi-Cancer Early Detection Testing in the Investigation of Cancer Symptoms: An Exploratory Retrospective Analysis of the SYMPLIFY Study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Individualised progesterone receptor modulator prevention strategies for triple-negative breast cancer in BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Review
- Molecular Cancer Signal Localization in MCED Testing Minimizes Radiation and Imaging Burden Compared with Whole-body Imaging Approaches.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Article
- Benchmarking reliability and calibration of LLMs for multi-cancer early detection test communication.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Advances in translational lung cancer research in 2025: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Article
- Clinical development of molecular residual disease (MRD) and multi-cancer early detection (MCED) using liquid biopsy multiomics with artificial intelligence (AI).International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
300 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
40 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer treatments are often more successful when the disease is detected early. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of multicancer blood testing coupled with positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) imaging to detect cancer in a prospective, interventional study of 10,006 women not previously known to have cancer. Positive blood tests were independently confirmed by a diagnostic PET-CT, which also localized the cancer. Twenty-six cancers were detected by blood testing. Of these, 15 underwent PET-CT imaging and nine (60%) were surgically excised. Twenty-four additional cancers were detected by standard-of-care screening and 46 by neither approach. One percent of participants underwent PET-CT imaging based on false-positive blood tests, and 0.22% underwent a futile invasive diagnostic procedure. These data demonstrate that multicancer blood testing combined with PET-CT can be safely incorporated into routine clinical care, in some cases leading to surgery with intent to cure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.