Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32345313›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2020

Migraine screen questionnaire: further psychometric evidence from categorical data methods.

Md Dilshad Manzar, Unaise Abdul Hameed, Mohammed Salahuddin, Mohammad Yunus Ali Khan, Dejen Nureye, Wakuma Wakene, Majed Alamri, Abdulrhman Albougami, Seithikuruppu R PandiPerumal, Ahmed S Bahammam

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sexual dysfunction in migraine-affected women: A prospective cross-sectional controlled study.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Md Dilshad ManzarDepartment of Nursing, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Majmaah University, Majmaah, 11952, Saudi Arabia.
Unaise Abdul HameedDepartment of Physiotherapy, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Al Mafraq, Abu Dhabi City, UAE.
Mohammed SalahuddinDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Mizan-Tepi University (Mizan Campus), Mizan-Aman, Ethiopia. salahuddin.mmohammed@gmail.com.
Mohammad Yunus Ali KhanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Mizan-Tepi University (Mizan Campus), Mizan-Aman, Ethiopia.
Dejen NureyeDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Mizan-Tepi University (Mizan Campus), Mizan-Aman, Ethiopia.
Wakuma WakeneDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Mettu University, Mettu, Ethiopia.
Majed AlamriNursing Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Hafr Al Batin, Haf Al Batin, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrhman AlbougamiDepartment of Nursing, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Majmaah University, Majmaah, 11952, Saudi Arabia.
Seithikuruppu R PandiPerumalSomnogen Canada Inc, College Street, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ahmed S BahammamThe University Sleep Disorders Center, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Box 225503, Riyadh, 11324, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

the Deanship of Scientific Research at Majmaah University RGP-2019-40
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychometric investigations of tools used in the screening of migraine including the migraine screen questionnaire (MS-Q), using an adequate statistical approach is needed. We assessed the psychometric properties of the migraine screen questionnaire (MS-Q) using categorical data methods. MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 343 students at Mizan-Tepi University, Ethiopia, age range = 18-35 years were selected by a simple random sampling method to participate in a cross-sectional study. The respondents completed the MS-Q, a semi-structured socio-demographic questionnaire, and a visual analog scale for attention (VAS-A).

resultsThe cumulative variance rule (> 40%), the Kaiser's criteria (Eigenvalue> 1), the Scree test and, the parallel analysis (minimum rank) identified a 1-factor model for the MS-Q with the factor loadings in the range of 0.78 to 0.84. Fit indices favored a 1-factor model of the MS-Q as indicated by comparative fit index (0.993), weighted root mean square residual (0.048), root mean square error of approximation (0.067), the goodness of fit index (1.00), and non-normed fit index (0.987). The values of the Factor Determinacy Index (0.953), marginal reliability (0.909), H-latent (0.909), H-observed (0.727), explained common variance (0.906) and the mean item residual absolute loadings (0.225) further complimented finding of the 1-Factor model. McDonald's Omega (0.903) suggested adequate internal consistency. Discriminative validity was supported by significantly higher scores for the total and all the MS-Q items except one among those with complaints of attention.

conclusionThe categorical methods support the psychometric validity of the MS-Q in the study population.

Indexed as

PsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMigraine DisordersQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSocioeconomic FactorsStudentsAfricaFactor analysisHeadacheMcDonald’s omegaStudent

Identifiers

PMID32345313
PMCPMC7189686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.