Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32345278›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Need for cognitive closure, tolerance for ambiguity, and perfectionism in medical school applicants.

Julia Gärtner, Lisa Bußenius, Sarah Prediger, Daniela Vogel, Sigrid Harendza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julia GärtnerIII. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Lisa BußeniusDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sarah PredigerIII. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Daniela VogelIII. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sigrid HarendzaIII. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. harendza@uke.de.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GK1801A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysicians have to deal with uncertainty on a daily basis, which requires high tolerance for ambiguity. When medical decisions have to be made in ambiguous situations, low levels of need for cognitive closure and high levels of adaptive perfectionism are beneficial. It might be useful to measure such personality traits during medical school selection processes. In our study, we explored the expression of need for cognitive closure, tolerance for ambiguity, and perfectionism in medical school applicants who participated in a multiple mini-interview selection process with respect to the final decision of admission or rejection.

methodsAfter participating in the multiple mini-interview procedure (HAM-Int) at Hamburg Medical School in August 2019, 189 medical school applicants filled out a questionnaire including the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale by Hewitt and Flett (MPS-H), the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale by Frost (MPS-F), the Tolerance for Ambiguity Scale (TAS), the 16-Need for Cognitive Closure Scale (16-NCCS), and sociodemographic data. After the final admission decision, the scores of need for cognitive closure, tolerance for ambiguity, and perfectionism of admitted and rejected applicants were compared. We also assessed the predictive power of need for cognitive closure and age for the admission decision in a binary logistic regression model.

resultsCompared to the admitted applicants, the rejected applicants showed a significantly higher need for cognitive closure (p = .009). A high need for cognitive closure correlated significantly positively with maladaptive perfectionism (p < .001) and significantly negatively with tolerance for ambiguity (p < .001). Low need for cognitive closure and older age were associated with a positive admission decision.

conclusionsRegarding the personality traits need for cognitive closure, tolerance for ambiguity, and perfectionism we identified interesting differences and correlations of relevance for physicians' daily work in medical school applicants who were admitted or rejected after participating in a multiple mini-interview selection procedure. Further studies are needed to investigate these characteristics and their development longitudinally in medical students and to correlate them with students' medical performance.

Indexed as

CognitionPerfectionismPersonalityUncertaintyAdultEducational MeasurementFemaleGermanyHumansMaleSchool Admission CriteriaSchools, MedicalStudents, MedicalMedical school admissionMultiple mini-interviewsNeed for cognitive closurePerfectionismSelection for medical schoolTolerance for ambiguityUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID32345278
PMCPMC7189591
OpenAlexW3019013617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.