Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32345274›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2020

Communication of children's weight status: what is effective and what are the children's and parents' experiences and preferences? A mixed methods systematic review.

H Ames, A Mosdøl, N Blaasvær, H Nøkleby, R C Berg, L J Langøien

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Parents' Experiences of Communication With School Nurses About Their Child's Weight Development in Sweden.The Journal of school nursing : the official publication of the National Association of School Nurses · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Weightism in Asia: A Narrative Review and Implications for Practice.Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H AmesThe Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. heather.ames@fhi.no.
A MosdølThe Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
N BlaasværThe Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
H NøklebyThe Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
R C BergThe Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
L J LangøienThe Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NO

Funding

Helsedirektoratet NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly intervention and conversation about a child's weight may offer an important chance of success in reducing weight and implementing a healthier lifestyle. This review explores the most effective ways to notify parents and children about the child's weight as well as their preferences and experiences around weight notification.

methodsWe systematically searched nine databases for relevant primary research. Records were independently screened by two authors. We extracted data into a form designed for this review. Effect data was analysed using narrative synthesis and qualitative data using a best-fit framework synthesis. We assessed our confidence in the evidence using GRADE and GRADE-CERQual.

resultsStudies of effect found that the format of feedback made little or no difference in parents attending further treatment, recognising their child as overweight or obese, reactions to the way the weight notification is given, motivation for lifestyle change, understanding how to reduce the risk of overweight, or taking any action. However, parents receiving feedback with motivational interviewing have somewhat greater satisfaction with the way the healthcare provider supports them. Qualitative studies found that parents had clear preferences for the format, timing, content and amount of information they wanted to receive in relation to both the weighing process and weight notification. They also had clear preferences for how they wanted health care providers to interact and communicate with them and their children. Both parents and children often felt that they were not receiving enough information and worried about how their results would be kept private. Many parents experienced an emotional response when told about their child's weight ranging from positive, disbelief and negative feelings. Those who reacted with disbelief or negatively were less likely to accept their child's weight status and/or act upon the notification letter. No studies reported results for children who were underweight.

conclusionsBased on these qualitative results people working with weight assessment and notification programs should consider parents' preferences when developing feedback formats, considering the mode of feedback they are going to use and provide parents and children with tailored feedback and personalized follow up once a child is identified as overweight or obese.

Indexed as

CommunicationBody WeightChildFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansLife StyleMaleMotivationParentsPatient PreferencePediatric ObesityProfessional-Family RelationsProfessional-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchWeight LossAdolescentsChildrenCommunicationParentsSystematic reviewWeightWeight assessmentWeight notification

Identifiers

PMID32345274
PMCPMC7189728
OpenAlexW3018971750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.