Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32345166›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2020

Mimicry diversification in

Martijn J T N Timmermans, Amrita Srivathsan, Steve Collins, Rudolf Meier, Alfried P Vogler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Functional genetic elements of a butterfly mimicry supergene.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Butterfly mimicry rings run in circles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genomic architecture and functional unit of mimicry supergene in female limited Batesian mimicPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in insect science · 2022
    Article
  15. Evolution of sexual development and sexual dimorphism in insects.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Martijn J T N TimmermansDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.
Amrita SrivathsanDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Steve CollinsAfrican Butterfly Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Rudolf MeierDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Alfried P VoglerDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.
National University of Singapore · SGNatural History Museum · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymorphic Batesian mimics exhibit multiple protective morphs that each mimic a different noxious model. Here, we study the genomic transitions leading to the evolution of different mimetic wing patterns in the polymorphic Mocker Swallowtail

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionAnimalsBiological MimicryButterfliesGenes, InsectGenomicsLinkage DisequilibriumPhenotypeRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidWings, AnimalBatesian mimicrybutterfliesgenomic rearrangementpolymorphismsupergene

Identifiers

PMID32345166
PMCPMC7282906
OpenAlexW3019105719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.