Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32344891›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Two Implant Placement Techniques in Sinus Region (Bone Graft versus Computer-Aided Implant Surgery): A Randomized Prospective Trial.

Ghazwan Almahrous, Sandra David-Tchouda, Aboubacar Sissoko, Nathalie Rancon, Jean-Luc Bosson, Thomas Fortin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01988480 (Clinical Assessment of Innovative Procedure Using Image-guided Surgery to Avoid Sinus Lift), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01988480 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Assessment of Innovative Procedure Using Image-guided Surgery to Avoid Sinus Lift

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospices Civils de LyonRan2009 to 2019Enrolled60ConditionsEdentulousArmsImage-guided surgery, Sinus lift surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: Patients' Experience and Perspectives.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025
    Review
  7. Beyond Accuracy: Clinical Outcomes of Computer Assisted Implant Surgery.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ghazwan AlmahrousDepartment of Oral Surgery, Dental School, University Claude Bernard, 69003 Lyon, France.
Sandra David-TchoudaThEMAS TIMC UMR CNRS 5525, Grenoble Joseph Fourier University, 38041 Grenoble, France.
Aboubacar SissokoCellule Data Stat, University Hospital of Grenoble, 38700 Grenoble, France.
Nathalie RanconDepartment of Oral Surgery, Hospices Civils, 69003 Lyon, France.
Jean-Luc BossonThEMAS TIMC UMR CNRS 5525, Grenoble Joseph Fourier University, 38041 Grenoble, France.
Thomas FortinDepartment of Oral Surgery, Dental School, University Claude Bernard, 69003 Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4676-2417
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) for two implant placement techniques in cases of sinus bone atrophy (bone graft surgery (BGS) versus computer-aided implant surgery (CAIS)), after surgery and one year later, and to evaluate the clinical success of both treatments.

methodsSixty patients with bone atrophy in the posterior maxilla and in need of implant placement were randomly assigned to two groups, and in accordance with the case report form (CRF), 30 were treated with BGS and 30 with CAIS. Immediately after treatment and one year later, PROMs were assessed, and the clinical success of both treatments was evaluated.

resultsNo significant differences were found between BGS and CAIS with regard to the following: loss of implants (

conclusionTreatment difficulty and number of consultations were higher for BGS than for CAIS, as well as peri-implantitis and bone craterization at one year, indicating significant differences between the two treatments. However, there were no statistically significant differences between BGS and CAIS regarding the other PROMs, at placement and after one year.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresSurgery, Computer-AssistedDental Restoration FailureFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaxillaProspective StudiesRadiographySinus Floor AugmentationTreatment Outcome3D imagingdental implantsplanning softwaresinus graftsurgical guide

Identifiers

PMID32344891
PMCPMC7246902
OpenAlexW3018980487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.