Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32344882›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Current Global Health Impact Assessment Practice.

Mirko S Winkler, Peter Furu, Francesca Viliani, Ben Cave, Mark Divall, Geetha Ramesh, Ben Harris-Roxas, Astrid M Knoblauch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mental Health and Mental Wellbeing Impact Assessment Frameworks-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Health Impact Assessments of Health Sector Proposals: An Audit and Narrative Synthesis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Microbes Saving Lives and Reducing Suffering.Microbial biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. 'Health in All Policies'-A Key Driver for Health and Well-Being in a Post-COVID-19 Pandemic World.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mirko S WinklerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7387-3863
Peter FuruGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, P.O. Box 2099, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1611-9060
Francesca VilianiInternational SOS, Vesterbrogade 149, 1620 København V Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ben CaveBCA Insight Ltd., 5-7 St Pauls Street, Gresham House, Leeds LS1 2JG, UK.
Mark DivallShape Consulting, P.O. Box 602, St Peter Port GY1, Guernsey, UK.
Geetha RameshGeetha Ramesh, 151 Canada Olympic Rd, Calgary, AB T3B 6B7, Canada.
Ben Harris-RoxasCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1716-2009
Astrid M KnoblauchSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5943-4362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health impact assessment (HIA) practice has expanded across the world, since it was established more than two decades ago. This paper presents a snapshot of current global HIA practice based on the findings of an online questionnaire survey. HIA practitioners from all world regions were invited to participate. A total of 122 HIA practitioners from 29 countries completed the survey, following a broad international outreach effort. The large variety in the types of HIAs conducted, and the application of HIA in various fields reported by respondents, demonstrates that HIA practice has evolved over the past two decades. Although differences in the use of HIA were reported across world regions, an overall increasing trend in global HIA practice can be observed. In order to sustain this upward trend, efforts are needed to address the main barriers in the utilisation of HIA. The establishment of new national and international HIA teaching and training offerings seems to be an obvious strategy to pursue along with the strengthening of policies and legal frameworks that specify the circumstances, under which HIA is required, and to what extent.

Indexed as

Health Impact AssessmentHealth PolicyPolicy MakingHumansPolicySurveys and Questionnairesdeterminants of healthhealth impact assessmentplanetary healthsustainable development goals

Identifiers

PMID32344882
PMCPMC7246701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.