ArticleNutrients2020
Cropland Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices.
Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Environmental Impact of Current Diets and Alternative Dietary Scenarios Worldwide: A Systematic Review.Nutrition reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Measuring land use impacts of national dietary guidelines: a scoping review of methods, trade-offs and policy implications.Environmental research. Food systems · 2026Review
- Article
- A quantitative environmental impact assessment of Australian ultra-processed beverages and impact reduction scenarios.Public health nutrition · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Nutritional, environmental and economic impacts of ultra-processed food consumption in Australia.Public health nutrition · 2023Article
- Cultivated Land Demand and Pressure in Southeast Asia from 1961 to 2019: A Comprehensive Study on Food Consumption.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Towards healthier and more sustainable diets in the Australian context: comparison of current diets with the Australian Dietary Guidelines and the EAT-Lancet Planetary Health Diet.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Diets with Higher Vegetable Intake and Lower Environmental Impact: Evidence from a Large Australian Population Health Survey.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Dietitians Australia position statement on healthy and sustainable diets.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2022Article
- An Alternative Nutrient Rich Food Index (NRF-ai) Incorporating Prevalence of Inadequate and Excessive Nutrient Intake.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A Rapid Review of the Environmental Impacts Associated with Food Consumption in Australia and New Zealand.Current nutrition reports · 2021Review
- Pesticide Toxicity Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices.Nutrients · 2021Article
- Diets within Environmental Limits: The Climate Impact of Current and Recommended Australian Diets.Nutrients · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Food systems vitally depend on croplands, which are a scarce natural resource. Croplands are also heterogeneous, differing in productive capability and in environmental context. Some are in regions of high biodiversity conservation importance, others in regions vulnerable to food insecurity. In this study, life cycle assessment was used to quantify cropland scarcity footprints, cropland biodiversity footprints and cropland malnutrition footprints for 9341 individual Australian adult daily diets. Dietary cropland scarcity footprints averaged 7.1 m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.