Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32344788›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Patient Opinion of Visiting Therapy Dogs in a Hospital Emergency Department.

Joanne Reddekopp, Colleen Anne Dell, Betty Rohr, Barbara Fornssler, Maryellen Gibson, Ben Carey, James Stempien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joanne ReddekoppFaculty of Education, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.
Colleen Anne DellDepartment of Sociology & School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A5, Canada.
Betty RohrCollege of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A5, Canada.
Barbara FornsslerSchool of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A5, Canada.
Maryellen GibsonDepartment of Sociology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A5, Canada.
Ben CareyDepartment of Sociology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A5, Canada.
James StempienEmergency Department, Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date there have been no studies examining whether patients want emergency department (ED) therapy dog programs. This patient-oriented study examined the opinions of patients about whether they would want to be visited by a therapy dog in the Royal University Hospital ED. Cross-sectional survey data were collected over a six week period from a convenience sample of 100 adult patients who had not been visited by a therapy dog in the ED. Most (80%) indicated they would want a visit by a therapy dog as an ED patient. A higher proportion of individuals who currently have a pet dog (95%) or identify as having lots of experience with dogs (71%) were more likely to indicate this want compared to those without a dog (90%) or little to no experience with dogs (62%). The majority were also of the opinion that patients may want to visit a therapy dog in the ED to reduce anxiety (92%) and frustration (87%) as well as to increase comfort (90%) and satisfaction (90%) and to a lesser extent to reduce pain (59%). There was no significant difference in findings by gender or age, other than a higher proportion of older adults and females identifying cultural background and tradition as a possible reason that patients may not want to be visited by a therapy dog. The findings of this study can help guide considerations for future ED therapy dog programs.

Indexed as

Animal Assisted TherapyAnxietyDogsEmergency Service, HospitalAgedAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPaincompanion dogemergency departmentpatient opinionpublic healththerapy dog

Identifiers

PMID32344788
PMCPMC7216105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.