ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
First Trimester Uterine Rupture: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report: Rare case of first-trimester uterine rupture at 9 weeks' gestation following multiple hysteroscopic surgeries and a prior cesarean section.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- First-trimester uterine rupture in a scarred uterus: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Spontaneous second-trimester uterine rupture in an unscarred uterus: A case report and review of literature.Case reports in women's health · 2025Article
- Traumatic Uterine Rupture in Second Trimester: Two Departments, Two Patients, Two Survivors.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- A cesarean section scar dehiscence during the first trimester of an intrauterine pregnancy: a rare case report and literature review.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Prenatal Detection and Conservative Management of Uterine Scar Dehiscence in Patient with Previous Uterine Rupture and Multiple Surgeries-A Case Report.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Life-Threatening Obstetrical Emergency: Spontaneous Uterine Rupture Associated with Placenta Percreta in the First Trimester of Pregnancy-Case Report and Literature Review.Reports (MDPI) · 2024Article
- First-trimester uterine rupture in a twin gestation after a motor vehicle collision: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Unexpected Uterine Rupture-A Case Report, Review of the Literature and Clinical Suggestions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Scar Tissue after a Cesarean Section-The Management of Different Complications in Pregnant Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Risk management of vaginal birth after cesarean section (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim is to report a case of spontaneous uterine rupture in the first trimester of pregnancy and to review the literature on the topic.
methodsA literature search was performed using PubMed and Scopus. Relevant English articles were identified without any time or study limitations. The data were aggregated, and a summary statistic was calculated.
resultsA 35-year-old gravida 5, para 2 was admitted at our department because of fainting and abdominal pain. The woman had a first-trimester twin pregnancy and a history of two previous cesarean sections (CSs). Suspecting a uterine rupture, an emergency laparotomy was performed. The two sacs were completely removed, and the uterine rupture site was closed with a double-layer suture. The patient was discharged from hospital four days later in good condition. On the basis of this experience, a total of 76 case reports were extracted from PubMed and included in the review. Fifty-three patients out of 76 (69.74%) underwent previous surgery on the uterus. Most women (67.92%) had a CS, and in this group a cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) or a placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorder was found to be the etiology in 77.78% of cases. Furthermore, 35.85% of the women had hysterectomy after uterine rupture. Twenty-three patients out of 76 (30.26%) had an unscarred uterus. Of this group, most women presented a uterine anomaly (43.48%). Moreover, 17.39% of these women had a hysterectomy.
conclusionAccording to the literature, the current pandemic use of CS explains most cases of first-trimester uterine rupture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.