Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32344692›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of Manual Feature Extraction Methods in Movement Related Cortical Potential Analysis.

Gemma Alder, Nada Signal, Usman Rashid, Sharon Olsen, Imran Khan Niazi, Denise Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gemma AlderHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.
Nada SignalHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9595-0532
Usman RashidHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1109-5493
Sharon OlsenHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7453-9127
Imran Khan NiaziHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8752-7224
Denise TaylorHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.
Auckland University of Technology · NZNew Zealand College of Chiropractic · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Event related potentials (ERPs) provide insight into the neural activity generated in response to motor, sensory and cognitive processes. Despite the increasing use of ERP data in clinical research little is known about the reliability of human manual ERP labelling methods. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were evaluated in five electroencephalography (EEG) experts who labelled the peak negativity of averaged movement related cortical potentials (MRCPs) derived from thirty datasets. Each dataset contained 50 MRCP epochs from healthy people performing cued voluntary or imagined movement, or people with stroke performing cued voluntary movement. Reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and standard error of measurement. Excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability was demonstrated in the voluntary movement conditions in healthy people and people with stroke. In comparison reliability in the imagined condition was low to moderate. Post-hoc secondary epoch analysis revealed that the morphology of the signal contributed to the consistency of epoch inclusion; potentially explaining the differences in reliability seen across conditions. Findings from this study may inform future research focused on developing automated labelling methods for ERP feature extraction and call to the wider community of researchers interested in utilizing ERPs as a measure of neurophysiological change or in the delivery of EEG-driven interventions.

Indexed as

AdultAgedConfidence IntervalsElectroencephalographyElectronic Data ProcessingEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStrokeYoung Adultelectroencephalography (EEG) processingevent related potential (ERP)inter-rater reliabilityintra-rater reliabilitymovement related cortical potential (MRCP)stroke

Identifiers

PMID32344692
PMCPMC7219488
OpenAlexW3020107871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.