Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32344685›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Cut-Off Analysis of CTC Change under Systemic Therapy for Defining Early Therapy Response in Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Thomas M Deutsch, Stefan Stefanovic, Manuel Feisst, Chiara Fischer, Fabian Riedel, Carlo Fremd, Christoph Domschke, Klaus Pantel, Andreas D Hartkopf, Marc Sutterlin and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Liquid biopsy-based early tumor and minimal residual disease detectionMedizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas M DeutschDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0621-1290
Stefan StefanovicDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mannheim University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Manuel FeisstInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Chiara FischerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Fabian RiedelDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9693-2667
Carlo FremdDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph DomschkeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Klaus PantelInstitute of Tumor Biology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5736-2772
Andreas D HartkopfDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Tübingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076 Tubingen, Germany.
Marc SutterlinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mannheim University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Sara Y BruckerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Tübingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076 Tubingen, Germany.
Andreas SchneeweissDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus WallwienerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

DISSECT ERC-2010-AdG_20100317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of circulating tumor cells (CTC) can distinguish between aggressive and indolent metastatic disease in breast cancer patients and is thus considered an independent, negative prognostic factor. A clear decline in CTCs is observed in patients who respond to systemic therapy. Nevertheless, CTCs can decrease in patients experiencing disease progression during systemic therapy, too. This study aims to determine the differences between CTC decline in patients responding to therapy and those in whom disease is progressing. Therefore, CTC values were compared at the start and after one cycle of a new line of systemic therapy. In all, 108 initially CTC-positive patients (with ≥5 intact CTCs in 7.5 mL blood) were enrolled in this study and intact and apoptotic CTCs were measured via the CellSearch

Indexed as

breast cancercirculating tumor cellscut-offearly progressiontherapy response

Identifiers

PMID32344685
PMCPMC7226373
OpenAlexW3017845084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.