Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32344683›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020

Therapeutic Physical Exercise Post-Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Alicia Del-Rosal-Jurado, Rita Romero-Galisteo, Manuel Trinidad-Fernández, Manuel González-Sánchez, Antonio Cuesta-Vargas, Maria Ruiz-Muñoz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Rowing through recovery: Psychophysical outcomes of a combined 12-week rowing and exercise program in breast cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alicia Del-Rosal-JuradoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Institute of Biomedicine of Málaga (IBIMA), Clinimetric Group (F-14), Chair of Physiotherapy and Disability, Faculty of Health Sciences, Andalucía Tech, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.
Rita Romero-GalisteoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Andalucía Tech, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4669-0679
Manuel Trinidad-FernándezDepartment of Physiotherapy, Institute of Biomedicine of Málaga (IBIMA), Clinimetric Group (F-14), Chair of Physiotherapy and Disability, Faculty of Health Sciences, Andalucía Tech, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7562-5986
Manuel González-SánchezDepartment of Physiotherapy, Institute of Biomedicine of Málaga (IBIMA), Clinimetric Group (F-14), Chair of Physiotherapy and Disability, Faculty of Health Sciences, Andalucía Tech, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3993-5092
Antonio Cuesta-VargasDepartment of Physiotherapy, Institute of Biomedicine of Málaga (IBIMA), Clinimetric Group (F-14), Chair of Physiotherapy and Disability, Faculty of Health Sciences, Andalucía Tech, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8880-4315
Maria Ruiz-MuñozDepartment of Nursing, Institute of Biomedicine of Málaga (IBIMA), Clinimetric Group (F-14), Chair of Physiotherapy and Disability, Faculty of Health Sciences, Andalucía Tech, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0454-2758
Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga · ESQueensland University of Technology · AUUniversidad de Málaga · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances achieved in diagnosis and improvements in treatment for breast cancer have resulted in a favourable survival rate. Therapeutic physical exercise (TPE) is presented as an intervention strategy that seeks to improve the functional capabilities of the subject. To analyse if clinical practice guidelines recommend therapeutic physical exercise to reduce the adverse effects of treatment in breast cancer survivors, and on what level of scientific evidence are these recommendations based. This systematic review was prepared by searching nine electronic databases to identify eligible studies. Thirteen met the criteria for inclusion. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) scale was used to analyse the quality of Clinical Practice Guideline (CPGs). The percentages obtained ranged between 30.07% and 75.70%. Specifically, the highest degree of evidence could be found in the application of TPE to offset adverse effects leading to effects such as: an increase in the quality of life, fatigue reduction, and reduction in body weight alterations. TPE is presented as an optimal intervention strategy to alleviate the negative effects that patients with breast cancer suffer as a result of the treatments received. The level of evidence that supports this claim is very strong for the majority of the side effects analysed. However, this evidence is not always included in the clinical practice guidelines.

Indexed as

breast cancerclinical practice guidelinephysical exercisesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32344683
PMCPMC7230832
OpenAlexW3017874567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.