Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32344631›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Concentration Distribution and Analysis of Urinary Glyphosate and Its Metabolites in Occupationally Exposed Workers in Eastern China.

Feng Zhang, Yanqiong Xu, Xin Liu, Liping Pan, Enmin Ding, Jianrui Dou, Baoli Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The MAK collection for occupational health and safety · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Feng ZhangDepartment of Occupational Disease, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Nanjing 210009, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5127-1279
Yanqiong XuDepartment of Occupational Disease, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Nanjing 210009, China.
Xin LiuDepartment of Occupational Disease, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Nanjing 210009, China.
Liping PanMedical Examination Center, Nanjing Prevention and Treatment Center for Occupational Disease, Nanjing 210038, China.
Enmin DingDepartment of Occupational Disease, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Nanjing 210009, China.
Jianrui DouDepartment of Occupational Hygiene, Yangzhou City Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Yangzhou 225000, China.
Baoli ZhuDepartment of Occupational Disease, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Nanjing 210009, China.
Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNNanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control And Prevention · CNYangzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AgricultureHerbicidesOccupational ExposureAdultChinaFemaleGlycineGlyphosateHumansMaleMiddle AgedWorkplaceGlycineGlyphosateHerbicidesaminomethylphosphonic acidconcentration distributionglyphosateurineworkers

Identifiers

PMID32344631
PMCPMC7215609
OpenAlexW3019813736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.