Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32344593›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2020

On the Use of Correlation and MI as a Measure of Metabolite-Metabolite Association for Network Differential Connectivity Analysis.

Sanjeevan Jahagirdar, Edoardo Saccenti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Age- and Sex-Dependent Changes of Free Circulating Blood Metabolite and Lipid Abundances, Correlations, and Ratios.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sanjeevan JahagirdarLaboratory of Systems and Synthetic Biology, Wageningen University and Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2213-4360
Edoardo SaccentiLaboratory of Systems and Synthetic Biology, Wageningen University and Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8284-4829

Funding

The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development 456008002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolite differential connectivity analysis has been successful in investigating potential molecular mechanisms underlying different conditions in biological systems. Correlation and Mutual Information (MI) are two of the most common measures to quantify association and for building metabolite-metabolite association networks and to calculate differential connectivity. In this study, we investigated the performance of correlation and MI to identify significantly differentially connected metabolites. These association measures were compared on (i) 23 publicly available metabolomic data sets and 7 data sets from other fields, (ii) simulated data with known correlation structures, and (iii) data generated using a dynamic metabolic model to simulate real-life observed metabolite concentration profiles. In all cases, we found more differentially connected metabolites when using correlation indices as a measure for association than MI. We also observed that different MI estimation algorithms resulted in difference in performance when applied to data generated using a dynamic model. We concluded that there is no significant benefit in using MI as a replacement for standard Pearson's or Spearman's correlation when the application is to quantify and detect differentially connected metabolites.

Indexed as

biological networksdata simulationdynamic modelmetabolomicsnetwork analysisnonlinearityPearson’s correlation coefficientpermutation testSpearman’s correlation coefficientToeplitz correlation

Identifiers

PMID32344593
PMCPMC7241243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.