Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32344580›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Novel Insights into the Pathogenesis of Spinal Sarcopenia and Related Therapeutic Approaches: A Narrative Review.

Yu-Kai Kuo, Yu-Ching Lin, Ching-Yu Lee, Chih-Yu Chen, Jowy Tani, Tsung-Jen Huang, Hsi Chang, Meng-Huang Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Molecular Mechanism and Pathogenesis of Sarcopenia: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu-Kai KuoSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Yu-Ching LinDepartment of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung & Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Keelung 20401, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2318-8507
Ching-Yu LeeDepartment of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Chih-Yu ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Jowy TaniStanford Byers Center for Biodesign, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Tsung-Jen HuangDepartment of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Hsi ChangDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Meng-Huang WuDepartment of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1606-2444
Taipei Medical University Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TWKeelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWNational Health Research Institutes · TWTaipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal sarcopenia is a complex and multifactorial disorder associated with a loss of strength, increased frailty, and increased risks of fractures and falls. In addition, spinal sarcopenia has been associated with lumbar spine disorders and osteoporosis, which renders making decisions on treatment modalities difficult. Patients with spinal sarcopenia typically exhibit lower cumulative survival, a higher risk of in-hospital complications, prolonged hospital stays, higher postoperative costs, and higher rates of blood transfusion after thoracolumbar spine surgery. Several studies have focused on the relationships between spinal sarcopenia, appendicular muscle mass, and bone-related problems-such as osteoporotic fractures and low bone mineral density-and malnutrition and vitamin D deficiency. Although several techniques are available for measuring sarcopenia, each of them has its advantages and shortcomings. For treating spinal sarcopenia, nutrition, physical therapy, and medication have been proven to be effective; regenerative therapeutic options seem to be promising owing to their repair and regeneration potential. Therefore, in this narrative review, we summarize the characteristics, detection methodologies, and treatment options for spinal sarcopenia, as well as its role in spinal disorders.

Indexed as

Disease SusceptibilityCombined Modality TherapyDiagnostic ImagingDisease ManagementDisease ProgressionHumansOrgan SizeSarcopeniaSpinal DiseasesSpineSymptom AssessmentTreatment Outcomeimage detectionmusclemyogenesispathogenesisspinal sarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID32344580
PMCPMC7216136
OpenAlexW3018043202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.