Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32344544›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Diagnostic Drama. Use of ICDAS II and Fluorescence-Based Intraoral Camera in Early Occlusal Caries Detection: A Clinical Study.

Marta Mazur, Maciej Jedliński, Artnora Ndokaj, Denise Corridore, Antonello Maruotti, Livia Ottolenghi, Fabrizio Guerra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Oral Prevention and Management of Oral Healthcare.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marta MazurDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Maciej JedlińskiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3446-6119
Artnora NdokajDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Denise CorridoreDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7333-4106
Antonello MaruottiDepartment of Mathematics, University of Bergen, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
Livia OttolenghiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7390-4316
Fabrizio GuerraDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITPomeranian Medical University · PLUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly diagnosis of occlusal caries is of paramount importance for a minimally invasive approach in dentistry. The aim of the present in vivo clinical prospective study was to compare the diagnostic outcomes of visual subjective evaluation between the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS-II) and an intraoral fluorescence-based camera (VistaCam iX Proof, Dürr Dental, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany) for the detection of pits and fissures in early caries lesions of posterior teeth.

methodsThe study included 1011 posterior teeth in 255 patients aged 13-20 years (mean age 16 ± 2.2 years). Two blinded operators evaluated all the occlusal surfaces and the first assigned an ICDAS-II code, while the second assessed the VistaCam score: sound enamel (score 0-1.2); initial enamel decay (score 1.2-1.5); dentine caries (score 1.5-3).

resultsSome 283 (28%) of the assessed teeth were ICDAS-II code 0; 334 (33%) code 1; 189 (18.7%) code 2; 176 (17.4%) code 3; and 29 (2.9%) code 4. The level of agreement between the two procedures was expressed by using Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa statistics and performing McNemar's test. VistaCam assessed in 513 (50.7%) sound enamel; in 292 (28.9%) initial enamel decay; and in 206 (20.4%) dentine caries.

conclusionsThis comparative study showed a poor agreement between the two diagnostic methods, especially between ICDAS-II 0, 1 and 2 codes and fluorescence assessments.

Indexed as

Dental CariesToothAdolescentAdultEarly DiagnosisGermanyHumansProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityYoung Adultcaries detectioncaries diagnosticsdentine cariesfluorescence cameraICDAS-IIocclusal cariesVistaCam

Identifiers

PMID32344544
PMCPMC7215869
OpenAlexW3020654690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.