Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32344427›Full record

ArticleBlood2020

CDK6 is an essential direct target of NUP98 fusion proteins in acute myeloid leukemia.

Johannes Schmoellerl, Inês Amorim Monteiro Barbosa, Thomas Eder, Tania Brandstoetter, Luisa Schmidt, Barbara Maurer, Selina Troester, Ha Thi Thanh Pham, Mohanty Sagarajit, Jessica Ebner and 17 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Johannes SchmoellerlInstitute for Medical Biochemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Inês Amorim Monteiro BarbosaResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas EderInstitute for Medical Biochemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Tania BrandstoetterInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Luisa SchmidtInstitute for Medical Biochemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Barbara MaurerInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Selina TroesterInstitute for Medical Biochemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ha Thi Thanh PhamInstitute for Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Mohanty SagarajitDepartment of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Jessica EbnerInstitute for Medical Biochemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gabriele ManhartInstitute for Medical Biochemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ezgi AslanTeam of Project Machine, Medical Faculty, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Stefan Terlecki-ZaniewiczInstitute for Medical Biochemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christa Van der VeenLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Cancer Research, Vienna, Austria.
Gregor HoermannDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Nicolas DuployezLaboratory of Hematology, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche en Santé (UMR-S) 1172, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.
Arnaud PetitHopital Trousseau, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Helene LapillonneHopital Trousseau, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Alexandre PuissantINSERM U944, Saint-Louis Research Institute, University of Paris, Paris, France.
Raphael ItzyksonINSERM U944, Saint-Louis Research Institute, University of Paris, Paris, France.
Richard MorigglInstitute for Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael HeuserDepartment of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Roland MeiselDivision of Pediatric Stem Cell Therapy, Clinic for Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Peter ValentDivision of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Internal Medicine I, and.
Veronika SexlInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Johannes ZuberResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.
Florian GrebienInstitute for Medical Biochemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATInserm · FRMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology · ATSorbonne Université · FRHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEIstanbul Medeniyet University · TRLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Cancer Research · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity Hospital Innsbruck · AT

Funding

European Research Council 636855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fusion proteins involving Nucleoporin 98 (NUP98) are recurrently found in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and are associated with poor prognosis. Lack of mechanistic insight into NUP98-fusion-dependent oncogenic transformation has so far precluded the development of rational targeted therapies. We reasoned that different NUP98-fusion proteins deregulate a common set of transcriptional targets that might be exploitable for therapy. To decipher transcriptional programs controlled by diverse NUP98-fusion proteins, we developed mouse models for regulatable expression of NUP98/NSD1, NUP98/JARID1A, and NUP98/DDX10. By integrating chromatin occupancy profiles of NUP98-fusion proteins with transcriptome profiling upon acute fusion protein inactivation in vivo, we defined the core set of direct transcriptional targets of NUP98-fusion proteins. Among those, CDK6 was highly expressed in murine and human AML samples. Loss of CDK6 severely attenuated NUP98-fusion-driven leukemogenesis, and NUP98-fusion AML was sensitive to pharmacologic CDK6 inhibition in vitro and in vivo. These findings identify CDK6 as a conserved, critical direct target of NUP98-fusion proteins, proposing CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors as a new rational treatment option for AML patients with NUP98-fusions.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAnimalsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Gene Expression ProfilingHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMiceNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsOncogene Proteins, FusionCDK6 protein, humanCdk6 protein, mouseCyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Nuclear Pore Complex ProteinsNup98 protein, humanOncogene Proteins, Fusion

Identifiers

PMID32344427
PMCPMC7115844
OpenAlexW3017752014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.