Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32344062›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

Cytoarchitecture of the mouse brain by high resolution diffusion magnetic resonance imaging.

Nian Wang, Leonard E White, Yi Qi, Gary Cofer, G Allan Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Merged magnetic resonance and light sheet microscopy of the whole mouse brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nian WangCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: nian.wang@duke.edu.
Leonard E WhiteDepartment of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Yi QiCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Gary CoferCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
G Allan JohnsonCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: gjohnson@duke.edu.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

INTEGRATED CENTER FOR IN VIVO MICROSCOPYP41EB015897 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, GEORGE ALLAN · 2012 to 2017
$7.4M
Waxholm Space for Rodent NeuroinformaticsR01NS096720 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GEE, JAMES C · 2016 to 2019
$2.4M
Agilent Direct Drive 9.4T MRS/MRI ConsoleS10OD010683 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, GEORGE ALLAN · 2012 to 2012
$597k
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015897NIH HHS S10 OD010683NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS096720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MRI has been widely used to probe the neuroanatomy of the mouse brain, directly correlating MRI findings to histology is still challenging due to the limited spatial resolution and various image contrasts derived from water relaxation or diffusion properties. Magnetic resonance histology has the potential to become an indispensable research tool to mitigate such challenges. In the present study, we acquired high spatial resolution MRI datasets, including diffusion MRI (dMRI) at 25 ​μm isotropic resolution and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) at 21.5 ​μm isotropic resolution to validate with conventional mouse brain histology. Diffusion weighted images (DWIs) show better delineation of cortical layers and glomeruli in the olfactory bulb than fractional anisotropy (FA) maps. However, among all the image contrasts, including quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), T1/T2∗ images and DTI metrics, FA maps highlight unique laminar architecture in sub-regions of the hippocampus, including the strata of the dentate gyrus and CA fields of the hippocampus. The mean diffusivity (MD) and axial diffusivity (AD) yield higher correlation with DAPI (0.62 and 0.71) and NeuN (0.78 and 0.74) than with NF-160 (-0.34 and -0.49). The correlations between FA and DAPI, NeuN, and NF-160 are 0.31, -0.01, and -0.49, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that MRI at microscopic resolution deliver a three-dimensional, non-invasive and non-destructive platform for characterization of fine structural detail in both gray matter and white matter of the mouse brain.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Tensor ImagingGray MatterMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLWhite MatterDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingDTIHigh resolutionHippocampusMagnetic resonance histologyQuantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM)

Identifiers

PMID32344062
PMCPMC7299741
OpenAlexW3018850970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.