Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32343872›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2020

Noncontrast Radiomics Approach for Predicting Grades of Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Yun Bian, Zengrui Zhao, Hui Jiang, Xu Fang, Jing Li, Kai Cao, Chao Ma, Shiwei Guo, Li Wang, Gang Jin and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Radiomics in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: methodological issues and clinical significance.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yun BianDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4863-4956
Zengrui ZhaoJiangsu Key Laboratory of Big Data Analysis Technique, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.
Hui JiangDepartment of Pathology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xu FangDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Kai CaoDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Chao MaDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Shiwei GuoDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Li WangDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Gang JinDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Jianping LuDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Jun XuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Big Data Analysis Technique, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.

Funding

Computerized histologic image predictor of cancer outcomeR01CA202752 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI FELDMAN, MICHAEL D, GANESAN, SHRIDAR · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Quantitative Histomorphometric Risk Classifier (QuHbIC) in HPV + Oropharyngeal CarcinomaR01CA220581 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KOYFMAN, SHLOMO, LEWIS, JAMES · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
Computerized Histologic Risk Predictor (CHiRP) for Early Stage Lung CancersR01CA216579 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI FU, PINGFU, LLOYD, MARK · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
MR Fingerprinting and Computerized Decision Support for Prostate CancerR01CA208236 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GULANI, VIKAS, PONSKY, LEE EVAN · 2017 to 2022
$3.0M
Pathology Image Informatics Platform for visualization, analysis and managementU24CA199374 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GURCAN, METIN NAFI, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
HistoTools: A suite of digital pathology tools for quality control, annotation and dataset identificationU01CA239055 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI JANOWCZYK, ANDREW ROBERT, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2019 to 2022
$1.0M
A Study to Validate and Improve an Automated Image Analysis Algorithm to Detect Tuberculosis in Sputum Smear SlidesR43EB028736 · NIBIB · DIASCOPIC, LLC · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT, SERIF, CARY · 2019 to 2019
$225k
RadIO: A Novel Radiomics Toolkit to Predict and Characterize Response to Immunotherapy in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung CancerI01BX004121 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI Anant Madabhushi, Charles J Nock · 2019 to 2026
–
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH FACILITIESC06RR012463 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KUTINA, KENNETH L · 1997 to 1997
–
BLRD VA I01 BX004121BLRD VA IK6 BX006185National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers 1U24CA199374-01National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers R01CA202752-01A1National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers R01CA208236-01ANCI NIH HHS R01 CA202752NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208236NCI NIH HHS R01 CA216579NCI NIH HHS R01 CA220581NCI NIH HHS U01 CA239055NCI NIH HHS U24 CA199374NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR012463NIBIB NIH HHS R43 EB028736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration is associated with the accurate determination of tumor grade. However, because it is an invasive procedure there is a need to explore alternative noninvasive procedures. PURPOSE: To develop and validate a noncontrast radiomics model for the preoperative prediction of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NF-pNET) grade (G). STUDY TYPE: Retrospective, single-center study. SUBJECTS: Patients with pathologically confirmed PNETs (139) were included. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T/breath-hold single-shot fast-spin echo T ASSESSMENT: Tumor features on contrast MR images were evaluated by three board-certified abdominal radiologists. STATISTICAL TESTS: Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to develop the clinical model. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method and linear discriminative analysis (LDA) were used to select the features and to construct a radiomics model. The performance of the models was assessed using the training cohort (97 patients) and the validation cohort (42 patients), and decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied for clinical use.

resultsThe clinical model included 14 imaging features, and the corresponding area under the curve (AUC) was 0.769 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.675-0.863) in the training cohort and 0.729 (95% CI, 0.568-0.890) in the validation cohort. The LDA included 14 selected radiomics features that showed good discrimination-in the training cohort (AUC, 0.851; 95% CI, 0.758-0.916) and the validation cohort (AUC, 0.736; 95% CI, 0.518-0.874). In the decision curves, if the threshold probability was 0.17-0.84, using the radiomics score to distinguish NF-pNET G1 and G2/3, offered more benefit than did the use of a treat-all-patients or treat-none scheme. DATA

conclusionThe developed radiomics model using noncontrast MRI could help differentiate G1 and G2/3 tumors, to make the clinical decision, and screen pNETs grade. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:1124-1136.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPancreatic NeoplasmsArea Under CurveCohort StudiesHumansRetrospective Studiesmagnetic resonance imagingNeoplasm Gradingneuroendocrine tumorspancreasradiomics

Identifiers

PMID32343872
PMCPMC7895298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.