Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32343628›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2020

Can the Adoption of Hypofractionation Guidelines Expand Global Radiotherapy Access? An Analysis for Breast and Prostate Radiotherapy.

Omoruyi Credit Irabor, William Swanson, Fiza Shaukat, Johanna Wirtz, Abba Aji Mallum, Twalib Ngoma, Ahmed Elzawawy, Paul Nguyen, Luca Incrocci, Wilfred Ngwa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Global perspective on implementing ultra-hypofractionated radiation therapy in breast cancer: a survey-based analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Democratizing FLASH Radiotherapy.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. From "dose erythema" to FLASH radiotherapy: impacts on clinical practice.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Omoruyi Credit IraborDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
William SwansonDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Fiza ShaukatBoston University, Boston, MA.
Johanna WirtzDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Abba Aji MallumNational Hospital, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Twalib NgomaMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Ahmed ElzawawySuez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Paul NguyenBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Luca IncrocciErasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wilfred NgwaDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.

Funding

Biomaterial Drones for Image-Guided Drug Delivery during radiotherapyR01CA239042 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NGWA, WILFRED · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA239042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe limited radiotherapy resources for global cancer control have resulted in increased interest in developing time- and cost-saving innovations to expand access to those resources. Hypofractionated regimens could minimize cost and increase access for limited-resource countries. In this investigation, we estimated the percentage cost-savings per radiotherapy course and increased radiotherapy access in African countries after adopting hypofractionation for breast and prostate radiotherapy. For perspective, results were compared with high-income countries.

methodsThe cost and course of breast and prostate radiotherapy for conventional and hypofractionated regimens in low-resource facilities were calculated using the Radiotherapy Cost Estimator tool developed by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and then compared with another activity-based costing model. The potential maximum cost savings in each country over 7 years for breast and prostate radiotherapy were then estimated using cancer incidence data from the Global Cancer Observatory database with use rates applied. The increase in radiotherapy access was estimated by current national capacities from the IAEA directory.

resultsThe estimated cost per course of conventional and hypofractionated regimens were US$2,232 and $1,339 for breast treatment, and $3,389 and $1,699 for prostate treatment, respectively. The projected potential maximum cost savings with full hypofractionation implementation were $1.1 billion and $606 million for breast and prostate treatment, respectively. The projected increase of radiotherapy access due to implementing hypofractionation varied between +0.3% to 25% and +0.4% to 36.0% for breast and prostate treatments, respectively.

conclusionThis investigation demonstrates that adopting hypofractionated regimens as standard treatment of breast and prostate cancers can result in substantial savings and increase radiotherapy access in developing countries. Given reduced delivery cost and treatment times, we anticipate a substantial increase in radiotherapy access with additional innovations that will allow progressive hypofractionation without compromising quality.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRadiation Dose HypofractionationAfricaForecastingHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID32343628
PMCPMC7193821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.