Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32343627›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2020

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Efficacy of a Community Health Worker-Driven Approach to Screen Hard-to-Reach Periurban Women Using Self-Sampled HPV Detection Test in India.

Usha Rani Poli, Richard Muwonge, Triveni Bhoopal, Eric Lucas, Partha Basu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Usha Rani PoliMNJ Institute of Oncology & Regional Cancer Center, Hyderabad, India.
Richard MuwongeScreening Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Triveni BhoopalMNJ Institute of Oncology & Regional Cancer Center, Hyderabad, India.
Eric LucasScreening Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Partha BasuScreening Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRMNJ Institute Of Oncology and Regional Cancer Centre · IN

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDetection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) in self-collected vaginal samples can significantly improve participation of hard-to-reach women; however, the implementation of such an approach in a real-life setting, especially in countries with limited resources, has certain challenges. Our study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of implementing an HPV self-sampling-based approach to screen a socioeconomically disadvantaged, unscreened population with support from community health workers (CHWs) for community mobilization, counseling, and navigation. Different triaging options for HPV-positive women were also assessed.

methodsWomen age 30 to 65 years from low socioeconomic periurban areas who had never been screened before were motivated by CHWs to attend local community centers and provide self-collected vaginal samples for

resultsWomen readily accepted to provide self-collected samples after counseling by CHWs. Screen positivity was 6.4%, and CHWs successfully navigated 65% of HPV-positive women to colposcopy. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ detection rate was 9.7 per 1,000 women screened. The HPV test had a positive predictive value of 15.3% to detect CIN 2+ lesions. Triage using visual inspection with acetic acid significantly improved the positive predictive value (49.5% to detect CIN 2+), but missed a significant number of CIN 2+ lesions. Colposcopy sensitivity was also suboptimal. Of 51 women with lesions, 80% underwent ablative treatment and the majority accepted same-day treatment.

conclusionCHW-driven self-sampling for HPV testing is feasible, well-accepted, and effective for screening unscreened hard-to-reach women. The screen-and-treat approach can ensure strong linkage between screening and treatment.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMiddle AgedPregnancyVaginal Smears

Identifiers

PMID32343627
PMCPMC7193819
OpenAlexW3018588468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.