Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32342843›Full record

Observational studyThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2020

Prevalence, Etiology, and Outcome of Sepsis among Critically Ill Patients in Malawi.

Meghan Prin, Lauren Onofrey, Laura Purcell, Clement Kadyaudzu, Anthony Charles

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Scope and mortality of adult medical ICU patients in an Eastern Cape tertiary hospital.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2022
    Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Meghan Prin1Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Lauren Onofrey2Department of Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Laura Purcell3Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Clement Kadyaudzu4Department of Anesthesiology, Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Anthony Charles3Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USKamuzu Central Hospital · MWUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are scarce data describing the etiology and clinical sequelae of sepsis in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study describes the prevalence and etiology of sepsis among critically ill patients at a referral hospital in Malawi. We conducted an observational prospective cohort study of adults admitted to the intensive care unit or high-dependency unit (HDU) from January 29, 2018 to March 15, 2018. We stratified the cohort based on the prevalence of sepsis as defined in the following three ways: quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score ≥ 2, clinical suspicion of systemic infection, and qSOFA score ≥ 2 plus suspected systemic infection. We measured clinical characteristics and blood and urine cultures for all patients; antimicrobial sensitivities were assessed for positive cultures. During the study period, 103 patients were admitted and 76 patients were analyzed. The cohort comprised 39% male, and the median age was 30 (interquartile range: 23-40) years. Eighteen (24%), 50 (66%), and 12 patients (16%) had sepsis based on the three definitions, respectively. Four blood cultures (5%) were positive, two from patients with sepsis by all three definitions and two from patients with clinically suspected infection only. All blood bacterial isolates were multidrug resistant. Of five patients with urinary tract infection, three had sepsis secondary to multidrug-resistant bacteria. Hospital mortality for patients with sepsis based on the three definitions ranged from 42% to 75% versus 12% to 26% for non-septic patients. In summary, mortality associated with sepsis at this Malawi hospital is high. Bacteremia was infrequently detected, but isolated pathogens were multidrug resistant.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsBacteremiaBurkholderia InfectionsCandida glabrataCandidiasis, InvasiveCeftriaxoneCohort StudiesCritical IllnessEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHospital MortalityHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsCeftriaxoneMetronidazole

Identifiers

PMID32342843
PMCPMC7356482
OpenAlexW3020243390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.