Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32342839›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2020

Development and Performance of Dengue Diagnostic Clinical Algorithms in Colombia.

Diana María Caicedo-Borrero, José Rafael Tovar, Andrés Méndez, Beatriz Parra, Anilza Bonelo, Jairo Celis, Liliana Villegas, Constanza Collazos, Lyda Osorio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Diana María Caicedo-BorreroGrupo de Investigación en Economía, Gestión y Salud, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Seccional Cali, Cali, Colombia.
José Rafael TovarSchool of Statistics, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Andrés MéndezSchool of Statistics, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Beatriz ParraDepartment of Microbiology, Grupo de Investigación en Virus Emergentes VIREM, School of Basic Sciences, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Anilza BoneloDepartment of Microbiology, Grupo de Investigación en Virus Emergentes VIREM, School of Basic Sciences, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Jairo CelisGrupo de Investigación en Evaluación de Servicios de Salud, COMFANDI, Cali, Colombia.
Liliana VillegasGrupo de Investigación en Evaluación de Servicios de Salud, COMFANDI, Cali, Colombia.
Constanza CollazosGrupo de Investigación en Evaluación de Servicios de Salud, COMFANDI, Cali, Colombia.
Lyda OsorioGrupo Epidemiología y Salud Poblacional GESP, School of Public Health, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosing dengue in endemic areas remains problematic because of the low specificity of the symptoms and lack of accurate diagnostic tests. This study aimed to develop and prospectively validate, under routine care, dengue diagnostic clinical algorithms. The study was carried out in two phases. First, diagnostic algorithms were developed using a database of 1,130 dengue and 918 non-dengue patients, expert opinion, and literature review. Algorithms with > 70% sensitivity were prospectively validated in a single-group quasi-experimental trial with an adaptive Bayesian design. In the first phase, the algorithms that were developed with the continuous Bayes formula and included leukocytes and platelet counts, in addition to selected signs and symptoms, showed the highest sensitivities (> 80%). In the second phase, the algorithms were applied on admission to 1,039 consecutive febrile subjects in three endemic areas in Colombia of whom 25 were laboratory-confirmed dengue, 307 non-dengue, 514 probable dengue, and 193 undetermined. Including parameters of the hemogram consistently improved specificity without affecting sensitivity. In the final analysis, considering only confirmed dengue and non-dengue cases, an algorithm with a sensitivity and specificity of 65.4% (95% credibility interval 50-83) and 40.1% (34.7-45.7) was identified. All tested algorithms had likelihood ratios close to 1, and hence, they are not useful to confirm or rule out dengue in endemic areas. The findings support the use of hemograms to aid dengue diagnosis and highlight the challenges of clinical diagnosis of dengue.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolColombiaDengueEndemic DiseasesFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID32342839
PMCPMC7253082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.