ArticleThe Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics2020
Protecting Participants in Genomic Research: Understanding the "Web of Protections" Afforded by Federal and State Law.
Article in The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patients and donors trust in data authorization for AI-based medical research.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Reshaping Precision Cancer Pain Management with Multimodal Artificial Intelligence: A Review on Subtyping and Treatment Response Prediction.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- A scoping review of human genetic resources management policies and databases in high- and middle-low-income countries.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Overcoming challenges associated with broad sharing of human genomic data.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Realising respiratory microbiomic meta-analyses: time for a standardised framework.Microbiome · 2023Article
- "Choice of law" in precision medicine research.American journal of human genetics · 2022Review
- Lessons learned and recommendations for data coordination in collaborative research: The CSER consortium experience.HGG advances · 2022Article
- Towards a Responsible Transition to Learning Healthcare Systems in Precision Medicine: Ethical Points to Consider.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Researchers now commonly collect biospecimens for genomic analysis together with information from mobile devices and electronic health records. This rich combination of data creates new opportunities for understanding and addressing important health issues, but also intensifies challenges to privacy and confidentiality. Here, we elucidate the "web" of legal protections for precision medicine research by integrating findings from qualitative interviews with structured legal research and applying them to realistic research scenarios involving various privacy threats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.