Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32342418›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Recovery, physicochemical and functional characteristics of proteins from different meat processing wastewater streams.

Cathrine M S Bethi, Bhaskar Narayan, Asha Martin, Tanaji G Kudre

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sustainable microalgal biomass production in food industry wastewater for low-cost biorefinery products: a review.Phytochemistry reviews : proceedings of the Phytochemical Society of Europe · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cathrine M S BethiMeat and Marine Sciences Department, CSIR-Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysuru, Karnataka, 570020, India.
Bhaskar NarayanMeat and Marine Sciences Department, CSIR-Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysuru, Karnataka, 570020, India.
Asha MartinFood Safety and Analytical Quality Control Department, CSIR-Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysuru, Karnataka, 570020, India.
Tanaji G KudreMeat and Marine Sciences Department, CSIR-Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysuru, Karnataka, 570020, India. tkudre@cftri.res.in.

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board ECR/2015/000215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recovery, physicochemical and functional characteristics of proteins recovered from different meat processing wastewater streams were revealed in the present study. Wastewaters from surimi processing (SPW) and slaughterhouses, namely fish (FSW), cattle (CSW), poultry (PSW), and goat (GSW), exhibited protein, fat, ash, moisture, and microbial load in the range of 1.28-7.04%, 0.86-2.34%, 0.02-0.80%, 89.81-97.44%, and 5.33-5.81 CFU/mL, respectively. Among the wastewaters, SPW presented slightly higher protein (7.04%), fat (2.34%), and ash (0.80%) contents (P < 0.05). Furthermore, proteins recovered from SPW (SPWP) and FSW (FSWP), CSW (CSWP), PSW (PSWP), and GSW (GSWP) presented yield, protein, fat, ash, and moisture content in the range of 55.54-76.81%, 65.86-78.22%, 7.26-11.45%, 4.58-11.75%, and 5.67-14.79%. All protein samples displayed higher essential amino acid (EAA) content with leucine (8.47-14.52 g/100 g) as a predominant amino acid. GSWP and SPWP scored the highest and lowest EAA contents, respectively. SPWP displayed myofibrillar proteins as dominant proteins, while slaughterhouses' wastewater proteins showed blood proteins as major proteins. β-Sheet is the major secondary structure presented by all protein samples. SPWP showed the highest lightness value as compared to other protein counterparts (P < 0.05). All protein samples from slaughterhouse wastewaters had the lowest protein solubility at pH 4.5. However, SPWP presented minimum solubility at pH 5.5. Among all protein samples, SPWP presented slightly higher water holding capacity and foaming property (P < 0.05), whereas FSWP displayed slightly higher emulsion property (P < 0.05). Overall, all meat processing wastewater streams served as good sources of high-quality proteins, which could be used as protein ingredients in animal feed formulation.

Indexed as

WastewaterAbattoirsAnimalsCattleMeatProteinsSolubilityProteinsWastewaterFunctional propertiesMicrobial loadPhysicochemical characteristicsProtein recoverySlaughterhouse wastewatersSurimi processing wastewater

Identifiers

PMID32342418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.