ArticleDoklady. Biochemistry and biophysics2020
Personalized Approach to Determination of Histidine-Rich Glycoprotein and E-Cadherin in Supernatants of Immunocompetent Blood Cells and Breast Biopsy Specimens in Breast Malignant and Non-Malignant Disease.
Article in Doklady. Biochemistry and biophysics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The material of patients with invasive carcinoma of no special type (ICNT) and nonmalignant diseases (ND) of the mammary gland was studied. When comparing the concentrations of histidine-rich glycoprotein (HRG) and E-cadherin (CDH1), statistically significant differences between ICNT and ND by HRG in the supernatant of blood cells and its spontaneous production by biopsies and by CDH1 at its induced production, as well as by influence indices of polyclonal activators on the production of CDH1 were found. When comparing the expression of immunohistochemical markers, no statistically significant differences between ICNT and ND were obtained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.