Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32342256›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2020

Effects of Electrode Location on Estimates of Neural Health in Humans with Cochlear Implants.

Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac, Timothy A Holden, Teresa A Zwolan, H Alexander Arts, Jill B Firszt, Christopher J Buswinka, Bryan E Pfingst

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cochlear Health and Cochlear-implant Function.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Assessing the Relationship Between Pitch Perception and Neural Health in Cochlear Implant Users.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kara C Schvartz-LeyzacKresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, Michigan Medicine, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5616, USA. leyzac@musc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8194-6513
Timothy A HoldenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Teresa A ZwolanHearing Rehabilitation Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Michigan Medicine, 475 W. Market Place, Building 1, Suite A, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA.
H Alexander ArtsHearing Rehabilitation Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Michigan Medicine, 475 W. Market Place, Building 1, Suite A, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA.
Jill B FirsztDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Christopher J BuswinkaKresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, Michigan Medicine, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5616, USA.
Bryan E PfingstKresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, Michigan Medicine, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5616, USA.
Michigan Medicine · USWashington University in St. Louis · USMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Functionally Important Features of the Electrically Stimulated CochleaR01DC015809 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PFINGST, BRYAN E · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015809NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC015809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are a number of psychophysical and electrophysiological measures that are correlated with SGN density in animal models, and these same measures can be performed in humans with cochlear implants (CIs). Thus, these measures are potentially applicable in humans for estimating the condition of the neural population (so called "neural health" or "cochlear health") at individual sites along the electrode array and possibly adjusting the stimulation strategy in the CI sound processor accordingly. Some measures used to estimate neural health in animals have included the electrically evoked compound potential (ECAP), psychophysical detection thresholds, and multipulse integration (MPI). With regard to ECAP measures, it has been shown that the change in the ECAP response as a function of increasing the stimulus interphase gap ("IPG Effect") also reflects neural density in implanted animals. These animal studies have typically been conducted using preparations in which the electrode was in a fixed position with respect to the neural population, whereas in human cochlear implant users, the position of individual electrodes varies widely within an electrode array and also across subjects. The current study evaluated the effects of electrode location in the implanted cochlea (specifically medial-lateral location) on various electrophysiological and psychophysical measures in eleven human subjects. The results demonstrated that some measures of interest, specifically ECAP thresholds, psychophysical detection thresholds, and ECAP amplitude-growth function (AGF) linear slope, were significantly related to the distances between the electrode and mid-modiolar axis (MMA). These same measures were less strongly related or not significantly related to the electrode to medial wall (MW) distance. In contrast, neither the IPG Effect for the ECAP AGF slope or threshold, nor the MPI slopes were significantly related to MMA or MW distance from the electrodes. These results suggest that "within-channel" estimates of neural health such as the IPG Effect and MPI slope might be more suitable for estimating nerve condition in humans for clinical application since they appear to be relatively independent of electrode position.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsAction PotentialsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychophysicscochlear implantelectrode placementneural health

Identifiers

PMID32342256
PMCPMC7392989
OpenAlexW3018415049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.