Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32342216›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2020

Efficacy of digital single-operator cholangioscopy in the visual interpretation of indeterminate biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pedro Victor Aniz Gomes de Oliveira, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi, Tomazo Antonio Prince Franzini, Marcos Eduardo Lera Dos Santos, Wanderley Marques Bernardo, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07007832 (The Diagnostic Value of Bile-based Omics Analysis for Indeterminate Biliary Strictures), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07007832 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Diagnostic Value of Bile-based Omics Analysis for Indeterminate Biliary Strictures

TypeobservationalSponsorShanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineRan2024 to 2026Enrolled260ConditionsCholangiocarcinoma, Gallbladder Cancer and Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, Pancreatic Cancer, Bile Duct Strictures of Unknown OriginArmsEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Peroral Cholangioscopy.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Role of Cholangioscopy in Biliary Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pedro Victor Aniz Gomes de OliveiraGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Instituto Central - Prédio dos Ambulatórios, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 05403-000, Brazil.
Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de MouraGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Instituto Central - Prédio dos Ambulatórios, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 05403-000, Brazil.
Igor Braga RibeiroGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Instituto Central - Prédio dos Ambulatórios, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 05403-000, Brazil. igorbraga1@gmail.com.
Ahmad Najdat BazarbashiDepartment of Medicine, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center Charleston Division, Charleston, WV, USA.
Tomazo Antonio Prince FranziniGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Instituto Central - Prédio dos Ambulatórios, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 05403-000, Brazil.
Marcos Eduardo Lera Dos SantosGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Instituto Central - Prédio dos Ambulatórios, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 05403-000, Brazil.
Wanderley Marques BernardoGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Instituto Central - Prédio dos Ambulatórios, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 05403-000, Brazil.
Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de MouraGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Instituto Central - Prédio dos Ambulatórios, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 05403-000, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIndeterminate biliary strictures remain a significant diagnostic challenge. Digital single-operator cholangioscopy (D-SOC) incorporates digital imaging which enables higher resolution for better visualization and diagnosis of biliary pathology. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of available literature in an attempt to determine the efficacy of D-SOC in the visual interpretation of indeterminate biliary strictures. MATERIAL AND

methodsElectronic searches were performed using Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. All D-SOC studies that reported the diagnostic performance in visual interpretation of indeterminate biliary strictures and biliary malignancies were included. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. All data were extracted and pooled to construct a 2 × 2 table. The visual interpretation of D-SOC was compared to resected surgical specimens or clinical follow-up in the included patients. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, prevalence, positive likelihood ratio (+LR), negative likelihood ratio (-LR), and diagnostic odds ratio (OR) were calculated. The summarized receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve corresponding with the area under the curve (AUC) was also analyzed.

resultsThe search yielded 465 citations. Of these, only six studies with a total of 283 procedures met inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of D-SOC in the visual interpretation of biliary malignancies was 94% (95% CI 89-97) and 95% (95%CI 90-98), respectively, while +LR, -LR, diagnostic OR, and AUC were 15.20 (95%CI 5.21-44.33), 0.08 (95%CI 0.04-0.14), 308.83 (95%CI 106.46-872.82), and 0.983, respectively. The heterogeneity among 6 included studies was moderate for specificity (I

conclusionD-SOC is associated with high sensitivity and specificity in the visual interpretation of indeterminate biliary strictures and malignancies. D-SOC should be considered routinely in the diagnostic workup of indeterminate biliary lesions.

Indexed as

Biliary Tract NeoplasmsBiliary Tract Surgical ProceduresCholestasisEndoscopy, Digestive SystemHumansPredictive Value of TestsBiliary malignanciesCholangioscopyDiagnosisIndeterminate stricturesMeta-analysisSpyglass

Identifiers

PMID32342216
OpenAlexW3020661793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.