Outcomes of computer-assisted peri-acetabular osteotomy compared with conventional osteotomy in hip dysplasia.

aim of the studyTo compare the outcomes after computer-assisted peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO) and conventional PAO performed for hip dysplasia (DDH).

methodsNinety-one patients (98 hips) were enrolled in this study. In each case, DDH was treated with either conventional PAO, in which the angle and direction of the osteotomy was determined by intra-operative X-ray examination, or with computer-assisted PAO, which used the 3D navigation system. Forty hips underwent conventional PAO and 58 hips underwent computer-assisted PAO.

resultsJapanese Orthopaedic Association hip scores improved significantly from 70.0 points pre-operatively to 90.7 points post-operatively in patients with conventional PAO, and from 74.5 points pre-operatively to 94.2 points post-operatively in patients with computer-assisted PAO. In all patients with computer-assisted PAO, the post-operative AHI and VCA angle were within the radiographic target zone. Some patients with conventional PAO had post-operative AHI and VCA angle outside of the target zone. We performed total hip arthroplasty (THA) on five of the 98 PAO hips (5.1%) after an average follow-up period of 5.4 years. None of 58 hips (0%) with computer-assisted PAO was revised. DISCUSSION: Computer-assisted PAO enabled intra-operative confirmation of osteotomy sites, and the position of the osteotomized bone fragment could be confirmed in real time. Adequate anterior and lateral coverage of the femoral head in patients with computer-assisted PAO resulted in no need for early conversion to THA, in contrast to conventional PAO.

conclusionComputer-assisted PAO not only improved accuracy and safety but also achieved sufficient anterior and lateral displacement to prevent the progression of DDH.