Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32342112›Full record

ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2020

A guide for urogynecologic patient care utilizing telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: review of existing evidence.

Cara L Grimes, Ethan M Balk, Catrina C Crisp, Danielle D Antosh, Miles Murphy, Gabriela E Halder, Peter C Jeppson, Emily E Weber LeBrun, Sonali Raman, Shunaha Kim-Fine and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05154760 (The Effectiveness of the Video Conferencing Telerehabilitation Method, Delivered in One on One and Group Sessions, in Urinary Incontinence Cases), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05154760 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of the Video Conferencing Telerehabilitation Method, Delivered in One on One and Group Sessions, in Urinary Incontinence Cases

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarmara UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled32ConditionsUrinary Incontinence,Stress, Telerehabilitation, Pelvic Floor Muscle Training, VideoconferencingArmsPelvic floor muscle training, diaphragmatic breathing exercise, core exercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Implementing telemedicine in urogynecology: A feasibility study.International urogynecology journal · 2023
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Telemedicine in Overactive Bladder Syndrome.Current bladder dysfunction reports · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Patient Acceptance of Telemedicine in Urogynecology Consultations - A Cross-Sectional Study Performed at a Brazilian Public Institution.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Gynecological Health: An Integrative Review.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Review
  19. Patient-Centered Goals for Treatment of Pelvic Floor Disorders.Current bladder dysfunction reports · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Cara L GrimesDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, New York Medical College, 19 Bradhurst Avenue, Suite 2700 South Hawthorne, Valhalla, NY, 10532, USA. caragrimesmd@gmail.com.
Ethan M BalkCenter for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Catrina C CrispDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, TriHealth, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Danielle D AntoshDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Miles MurphyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gabriela E HalderDepartment of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Peter C JeppsonDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Emily E Weber LeBrunDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Sonali RamanDepartment of Women's Health, Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, St. Elizabeth Healthcare, Fort Thomas, KY, USA.
Shunaha Kim-FineSection of Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Cheryl IglesiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Alexis A DieterDivision of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Ladin Yurteri-KaplanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Gaelen AdamCenter for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Kate V MeriwetherDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

Funding

Society for Gynecologic surgeons Funding provided by the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons (SGS) supports assistance by methods experts in systematic reviews and other logistics.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe COVID-19 pandemic and the desire to "flatten the curve" of transmission have significantly affected the way providers care for patients. Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgeons (FPMRS) must provide high quality of care through remote access such as telemedicine. No clear guidelines exist on the use of telemedicine in FPMRS. Using expedited literature review methodology, we provide guidance regarding management of common outpatient urogynecology scenarios during the pandemic.

methodsWe grouped FPMRS conditions into those in which virtual management differs from direct in-person visits and conditions in which treatment would emphasize behavioral and conservative counseling but not deviate from current management paradigms. We conducted expedited literature review on four topics (telemedicine in FPMRS, pessary management, urinary tract infections, urinary retention) and addressed four other topics (urinary incontinence, prolapse, fecal incontinence, defecatory dysfunction) based on existing systematic reviews and guidelines. We further compiled expert consensus regarding management of FPMRS patients in the virtual setting, scenarios when in-person visits are necessary, symptoms that should alert providers, and specific considerations for FPMRS patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19.

resultsBehavioral, medical, and conservative management will be valuable as first-line virtual treatments. Certain situations will require different treatments in the virtual setting while others will require an in-person visit despite the risks of COVID-19 transmission.

conclusionsWe have presented guidance for treating FPMRS conditions via telemedicine based on rapid literature review and expert consensus and presented it in a format that can be actively referenced.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesGynecologyHumansInfection ControlPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2TelemedicineCOVID-19FPMRSPandemicSystematic reviewTelemedicineUrogynecologyVirtual visit

Identifiers

PMID32342112
PMCPMC7185267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.