ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2020
Development and validation of the Lesion Synthesis Toolbox and the Perception Study Tool for quantifying observer limits of detection of lesions in positron emission tomography.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of artificial intelligence performance for lesion detection using synthetic lesions in PET imaging.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Assessment of lesion insertion tool in pelvis PET/MR data with applications to attenuation correction method development.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Insertion of synthetic lesions on patient data: a method for evaluating clinical performance differences between PET systems.EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a method based on synthetic data inserted into raw data prior to reconstruction for the assessment of PET scanners.EJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- Evaluation of attenuation correction in PET/MRI with synthetic lesion insertion.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.