Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32341832›Full record

ReviewTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2020

Anatomic variations of the Uterine Artery. Review of the literature and their clinical significance.

Konstantinos Liapis, Nikolaos Tasis, Ioannis Tsouknidas, George Tsakotos, Panagiotis Skandalakis, Konstantinos Vlasis, Dimitrios Filippou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anatomic variation of a duplicated uterine artery.Anatomical science international · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Konstantinos LiapisNational and Kapodestrian University of Athens Medical School, Department of Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1165-9639
Nikolaos TasisNational and Kapodestrian University of Athens Medical School, Department of Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8523-6316
Ioannis TsouknidasNational and Kapodestrian University of Athens Medical School, Department of Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8523-6316
George TsakotosNational and Kapodestrian University of Athens Medical School, Department of Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8559-8969
Panagiotis SkandalakisNational and Kapodestrian University of Athens Medical School, Department of Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9325-5533
Konstantinos VlasisNational and Kapodestrian University of Athens Medical School, Department of Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6113-4086
Dimitrios FilippouNational and Kapodestrian University of Athens Medical School, Department of Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5410-3046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine arteries are the main vessels supplying blood to the uterus. Mainly, they originate from the anterior trunk of the internal iliac artery. Uterine arteries play an important role in pregnancy as well as transcatheter arterial embolization for postpartum hemorrhage and uterine fibroid management. This is a review of the English literature in the PubMed database of the anatomic variety on the origin of uterine arteries and their clinical significance. Eleven studies describe the origin of the uterine arteries and their variations in the literature. In six studies, the uterine artery emerged from internal iliac artery in the majority of the cases, either as a separate branch, or as a bifurcation with the inferior gluteal artery, or trifurcation with superior and inferior gluteal artery. In two studies, the inferior gluteal artery manifested as the main source of the uterine artery, whereas in three studies, the umbilical artery posed as its main origin. Internal iliac artery is described as the most common vascular origin of uterine artery. However, this review highlights that the main vessels of origin for uterine arteries are internal iliac, umbilical and inferior gluteal artery. Nevertheless, classification and further research for this peculiar anatomic structure is fundamental in the future.

Indexed as

anatomic variationbranchoriginUterine artery

Identifiers

PMID32341832
PMCPMC7171538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.