Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32341790›Full record

Observational studyLupus science & medicine2020

Real-world treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilisation and costs in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus treated with belimumab: a retrospective analysis of claims data in the USA.

Christopher F Bell, Julie Priest, Marni Stott-Miller, Hong Kan, Justyna Amelio, Xue Song, Brendan Limone, Virginia Noxon, Karen H Costenbader

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Lupus science & medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher F BellUS Value, Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6413-2537
Julie PriestUS Health Outcomes, ViiV Healthcare, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Marni Stott-MillerEpidemiology, Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Uxbridge, UK.
Hong KanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Justyna AmelioEpidemiology, Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Stevenage, UK.
Xue SongIBM Watson Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Brendan LimoneIBM Watson Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Virginia NoxonIBM Watson Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Karen H CostenbaderRheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
IBM (United States) · USAge UK · GBBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHealth Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) · GBJohns Hopkins University · USResearch Triangle Park Foundation · US

Funding

Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology in Patients with LupusK24AR066109 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI COSTENBADER, KAREN H · 2014 to 2023
$1.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR066109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effects of belimumab initiation on healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) and costs in SLE. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study used healthcare administrative claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database to identify patients with SLE billing codes who received ≥1 intravenous belimumab infusion between March 2011 and December 2015. The first belimumab administration was the 'index date'. During the 6-month postindex period, nine belimumab infusions were recommended: three during the initiation period and six during the maintenance period. HCRU and cost data for inpatient admissions, emergency department visits, physician office visits, hospital-based outpatient visits, laboratory services, other outpatient services and outpatient pharmacy prescriptions were compared in the 6-month pre/postindex periods. Results: Of the 1879 patients with SLE included, 43% received ≥3 intravenous initiation administrations. An average of 5.3 (SD: 2.4) of the nine recommended belimumab administrations were received within 6 months. In the 6-month preindex versus postindex periods, significant reductions were noted for inpatient hospitalisations (18% vs 9%, p<0.001; mean visits: 0.3 vs 0.14, p<0.001) and emergency department visits (40% vs 24%, p<0.001; mean visits; 3.53 vs 1.96, p<0.001). Mean total costs were higher in the 6-month postindex versus preindex period ($41 426 vs $29 270; p<0.001). Conclusions: In this study of real-world intravenous belimumab for SLE, adherence to recommended infusion schedules was low. Outpatient healthcare and associated costs were higher in the 6 months after belimumab was initiated, although inpatient costs were lower. Reasons for non-adherence with belimumab and implications should be investigated.

Indexed as

Administrative Claims, HealthcareAdultAmbulatory CareAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCost of IllnessData ManagementDrug MonitoringFemaleHealth ResourcesHospitalizationHumansInfusions, IntravenousLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedbelimumabeconomic evaluations/burden of diseasesystemic lupus erythematosustreatment

Identifiers

PMID32341790
PMCPMC7174061
OpenAlexW3013296593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.