Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32341664›Full record

ArticleOpen access emergency medicine : OAEM2020

The Safety of Early Thromboembolic Prophylaxis in Closed Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage.

Mohammad Ahmad Jamous

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open access emergency medicine : OAEM, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohammad Ahmad JamousDepartment of Neurosurgery, King Abdulla University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI); this study is testing the safety of enoxaparin use for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in this group of patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsFrom January 2016 to May 2018, 46 patients (36 males, 10 females) with closed traumatic intracranial bleeding received early (ie, within 72 hours) venous thromboembolic prophylaxis with 40 mg of enoxaparin. Patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage were followed up both clinically and with repeated brain computed tomography to examine the safety of enoxaparin VTE prophylaxis.

resultsThe age of the patients ranged from 16-91 years (43.9±25.8 years). Glasgow coma score ranged from 5-15 (9.9±4.7). Twenty patients had mild TBI (GCS 15-13), 17 patients had moderate TBI (GCS 12-9), and nine patients had severe TBI (GCS≤8). Brain computed tomography showed variable types of brain injuries. Non-surgical management was applied for 18 patients. Craniotomy and surgical evacuation of significant (≥1cm in maximum diameter) EDH and/or SDH was carried out in 26 patients. External ventricular drain was inserted in two patients with significant IVH. Thirty-eight patients had good overall outcome, eight patients showed poor outcome. None of the reviewed patients developed clinical deterioration and/or progression of the intracranial bleeding on follow-up brain CT scans.

conclusionEnoxaparin is a safe prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in patients with traumatic closed intracranial bleeding.

Indexed as

DVT prophylaxisenoxaparinhead injuryintracranial hemorrhagepharmacologic thrombosis prophylaxistraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID32341664
PMCPMC7166068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.