Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32341659›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2020

Different Clinical Manifestations of Human Brucellosis in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Scoping Review of 521 Cases from 10 Countries.

Zhe Liu, Dawei Wei, Yanjun Li, Hao Zhou, Desheng Huang, Peng Guan

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Adhesive Functions or Pseudogenization of Type Va Autotransporters inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhe LiuDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Dawei WeiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Yanjun LiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8457-8517
Hao ZhouDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Desheng HuangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-7648-3625
Peng GuanDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-0190-7301
China Medical University · CNCriminal Investigation Police University of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis systematic scoping review aims to assess the frequency and severity of clinical manifestations of pregnant women with brucellosis.

methodsThree literature databases, PubMed, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and two search engines (Google and Yahoo) were adopted to identify the relevant articles that published until 31 December 2019. Two investigators independently screened the publications and extracted the data; the case reports and case series which described at least two symptoms or clinical manifestations of pregnant women with brucellosis were included.

resultsA total of 27 articles describing the information of 521 pregnant women with brucellosis were included. Serum agglutination test was the most common laboratory test in the diagnosis of brucellosis. A total of 36 clinical manifestations were extracted from the included articles, and the most common clinical manifestations were fever (400, 76.8%), joint pain/swelling/arthralgia (389, 74.7%), sweats (382, 73.3%), fatigue/asthenia/weakness (262, 50.3%) and back pain (189, 36.3%). Among the 32 included individual cases that with available obstetric outcome information, 10 (31.3%) suffered preterm delivery, 12 (37.5%) had an abortion and 3 (9.8%) had intrauterine fetal death.

conclusionBrucellosis is popular and threatening for pregnant women. Regarding the localized body system complications, osteoarticular system was mostly involved, the obstetrics outcomes were severe among pregnant women with brucellosis. The detailed clinical and epidemiological characteristics in this scoping review may add a better and more complete understanding of the disease for both physicians and policy-makers, and provide evidence for timely diagnosis, adequate therapy and better prevention.

Indexed as

human brucellosispregnancyreviewsigns and symptoms

Identifiers

PMID32341659
PMCPMC7166055
OpenAlexW3015857750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.