Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32341614›Full record

ReviewLandscape and urban planning2020

A conceptual framework to untangle the concept of urban ecosystem services.

Puay Yok Tan, Jingyuan Zhang, Mahyar Masoudi, Jahson Berhane Alemu, Peter J Edwards, Adrienne Grêt-Regamey, Daniel R Richards, Justine Saunders, Xiao Ping Song, Lynn Wei Wong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Landscape and urban planning, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Puay Yok TanDepartment of Architecture, School of Design and Environment, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Jingyuan ZhangDepartment of Architecture, School of Design and Environment, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Mahyar MasoudiDepartment of Architecture, School of Design and Environment, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Jahson Berhane AlemuDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Peter J EdwardsSingapore-ETH Centre, ETH Zurich, Singapore.
Adrienne Grêt-RegameyChair of Planning of Landscape and Urban Systems, ETH Zurich. Switzerland.
Daniel R RichardsSingapore-ETH Centre, ETH Zurich, Singapore.
Justine SaundersSingapore-ETH Centre, ETH Zurich, Singapore.
Xiao Ping SongDepartment of Architecture, School of Design and Environment, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Lynn Wei WongCampus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban ecosystem service (UES) is becoming an influential concept to guide the planning, design, and management of urban landscapes towards urban sustainability. However, its use is hindered by definitional ambiguity, and the conceptual bases underpinning its application remain weak. This is exemplified by two different but equally valid interpretations of UES: "urban

Identifiers

PMID32341614
PMCPMC7183943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.