Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32341560›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2020

Systematic comparison of single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing methods.

Jiarui Ding, Xian Adiconis, Sean K Simmons, Monika S Kowalczyk, Cynthia C Hession, Nemanja D Marjanovic, Travis K Hughes, Marc H Wadsworth, Tyler Burks, Lan T Nguyen and 12 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 545 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
545citing papers in PubMed
52.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

545 citing papers in PubMed, 935 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Distinct single-nucleus RNA-seq changes among non-neuronal cells in ADNC, LATE-NC, and mixed pathologies.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Unifying multimodal single-cell data with a mixture-of-expertsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

485 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiarui DingBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Xian Adiconis *Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Sean K Simmons *Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Monika S KowalczykBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Cynthia C HessionBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Nemanja D MarjanovicBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Travis K HughesBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Marc H WadsworthBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Tyler BurksBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Lan T NguyenBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
John Y H KwonBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Boaz BarakMcGovern Institute for Brain Research and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
William GeBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2278-8201
Amanda J KedaigleBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6156-5046
Shaina CarrollBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Shuqiang LiBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Nir HacohenBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Orit Rozenblatt-RosenBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Alex K ShalekBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5670-8778
Alexandra-Chloé VillaniBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Aviv RegevBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3293-3158
Joshua Z LevinBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. jlevin@broadinstitute.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0170-3598
Broad Institute · USMcGovern Institute for Brain Research · US

Funding

Tool and Technology Development CoreU19MH114821 · NIMH · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI ZADOR, ANTHONY M · 2017 to 2021
$64.5M
Pilot & Feasibility ProgramP30DK043351 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI RAYMOND T CHUNG · 1991 to 2026
$35.3M
Center for Cell CircuitsRM1HG006193 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI BLAINEY, PAUL CLARK, HACOHEN, NIR · 2016 to 2020
$14.9M
The Cellular Geography of Therapeutic Resistance in CancerU2CCA233195 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI VAN ALLEN, ELIEZER M · 2018 to 2023
$13.7M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS U2C CA233195NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG006193NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK043351NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH114821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scale and capabilities of single-cell RNA-sequencing methods have expanded rapidly in recent years, enabling major discoveries and large-scale cell mapping efforts. However, these methods have not been systematically and comprehensively benchmarked. Here, we directly compare seven methods for single-cell and/or single-nucleus profiling-selecting representative methods based on their usage and our expertise and resources to prepare libraries-including two low-throughput and five high-throughput methods. We tested the methods on three types of samples: cell lines, peripheral blood mononuclear cells and brain tissue, generating 36 libraries in six separate experiments in a single center. To directly compare the methods and avoid processing differences introduced by the existing pipelines, we developed scumi, a flexible computational pipeline that can be used with any single-cell RNA-sequencing method. We evaluated the methods for both basic performance, such as the structure and alignment of reads, sensitivity and extent of multiplets, and for their ability to recover known biological information in the samples.

Indexed as

SoftwareAnimalsBrainCells, CulturedHumansLeukocytes, MononuclearMiceSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID32341560
PMCPMC7289686
OpenAlexW3015184839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.