Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32341459›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Regeneration of segmental defects in metatarsus of sheep with vascularized and customized 3D-printed calcium phosphate scaffolds.

Luciano Vidal, Carina Kampleitner, Stéphanie Krissian, Meadhbh Á Brennan, Oskar Hoffmann, Yago Raymond, Yassine Maazouz, Maria-Pau Ginebra, Philippe Rosset, Pierre Layrolle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Luciano VidalInserm, UMR 1238, PHY-OS, Bone sarcomas and remodelling of calcified tissues, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nantes, Nantes, 44035, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4135-8792
Carina Kampleitner *University of Vienna, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Stéphanie Krissian *Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Tours, University of Tours, Tours, 37000, France.
Meadhbh Á BrennanInserm, UMR 1238, PHY-OS, Bone sarcomas and remodelling of calcified tissues, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nantes, Nantes, 44035, France.
Oskar HoffmannUniversity of Vienna, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Yago RaymondUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Group of Biomaterials, Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering, Barcelona, 08019, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8302-3002
Yassine MaazouzUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Group of Biomaterials, Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering, Barcelona, 08019, Spain.
Maria-Pau GinebraUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Group of Biomaterials, Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering, Barcelona, 08019, Spain.
Philippe RossetInserm, UMR 1238, PHY-OS, Bone sarcomas and remodelling of calcified tissues, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nantes, Nantes, 44035, France.
Pierre LayrolleInserm, UMR 1238, PHY-OS, Bone sarcomas and remodelling of calcified tissues, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nantes, Nantes, 44035, France. pierre.layrolle@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9800-5210
Centre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications · ESInserm · FRUniversité de Tours · FRUniversity of Vienna · ATHarvard University · USInstitute for Bioengineering of Catalonia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although autografts are considered to be the gold standard treatment for reconstruction of large bone defects resulting from trauma or diseases, donor site morbidity and limited availability restrict their use. Successful bone repair also depends on sufficient vascularization and to address this challenge, novel strategies focus on the development of vascularized biomaterial scaffolds. This pilot study aimed to investigate the feasibility of regenerating large bone defects in sheep using 3D-printed customized calcium phosphate scaffolds with or without surgical vascularization. Pre-operative computed tomography scans were performed to visualize the metatarsus and vasculature and to fabricate customized scaffolds and surgical guides by 3D printing. Critical-sized segmental defects created in the mid-diaphyseal region of the metatarsus were either left empty or treated with the 3D scaffold alone or in combination with an axial vascular pedicle. Bone regeneration was evaluated 1, 2 and 3 months post-implantation. After 3 months, the untreated defect remained non-bridged while the 3D scaffold guided bone regeneration. The presence of the vascular pedicle further enhanced bone formation. Histology confirmed bone growth inside the porous 3D scaffolds with or without vascular pedicle inclusion. Taken together, this pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of precised pre-surgical planning and reconstruction of large bone defects with 3D-printed personalized scaffolds.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone RegenerationCalcium PhosphatesMetatarsusPilot ProjectsPrinting, Three-DimensionalSheepTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible Materialscalcium phosphateCalcium Phosphates

Identifiers

PMID32341459
PMCPMC7184564
OpenAlexW3017897403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.